These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28754490)

  • 1. The effect of category learning on attentional modulation of visual cortex.
    Folstein JR; Fuller K; Howard D; DePatie T
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Sep; 104():18-30. PubMed ID: 28754490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of category learning on visual attention and visual representation.
    Folstein JR; Monfared SS; Maravel T
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1855-1871. PubMed ID: 28776708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is that a belt or a snake? Object attentional selection affects the early stages of visual sensory processing.
    Zani A; Proverbio AM
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Feb; 8():6. PubMed ID: 22300540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Rapid Capture of Attention by Rewarded Objects.
    Donohue SE; Hopf JM; Bartsch MV; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 26741800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended categorization of conjunction object stimuli decreases the latency of attentional feature selection and recruits orthography-linked ERPs.
    Folstein JR; Monfared SS
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():49-65. PubMed ID: 31233910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late electrophysiological modulations of feature-based attention to object shapes.
    Stojanoski BB; Niemeier M
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Mar; 51(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 24423181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus dependency of object-evoked responses in human visual cortex: an inverse problem for category specificity.
    Graewe B; De Weerd P; Farivar R; Castelo-Branco M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30727. PubMed ID: 22363479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parallel attentional facilitation of features and objects in early visual cortex.
    Adamian N; Andersen SK; Hillyard SA
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13498. PubMed ID: 31691314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changing similarity: Stable and flexible modulations of psychological dimensions.
    Dieciuc M; Roque NA; Folstein JR
    Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 1670():208-219. PubMed ID: 28669719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential impact of attention on the early and late categorization related human brain potentials.
    Nasr S
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):18. PubMed ID: 20884513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-individual differences in the polarity of early visual responses and attention effects.
    Proverbio AM; Del Zotto M; Zani A
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 419(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 17490815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining features from ERP components in single-trial EEG for discriminating four-category visual objects.
    Wang C; Xiong S; Hu X; Yao L; Zhang J
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Oct; 9(5):056013. PubMed ID: 22983495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search performance is predicted by the degree to which selective attention to features modulates the ERP between 350 and 600ms.
    Milne E; Dunn SA; Freeth M; Rosas-Martinez L
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 May; 51(6):1109-18. PubMed ID: 23499721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Control for Objects: Decoding EEG Alpha When Anticipating Faces, Scenes,and Tools.
    Noah S; Powell T; Khodayari N; Olivan D; Ding M; Mangun GR
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 40(25):4913-4924. PubMed ID: 32404346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-down directed attention to stimulus features and attentional allocation to bottom-up deviations.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):4.1-8. PubMed ID: 19146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional load modifies early activity in human primary visual cortex.
    Rauss KS; Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P; Schwartz S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 May; 30(5):1723-33. PubMed ID: 18711710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.