These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28755012)

  • 1. Perceptual similarity induces overinvestment in an attentional blink task.
    MacLellan E; Shore DI; Milliken B
    Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 28755012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus localization interferes with stimulus recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.
    Griffiths G; Herwig A; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 23757511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The attentional blink is not affected by backward masking of T2, T2-mask SOA, or level of T2 impoverishment.
    Jannati A; Spalek TM; Lagroix HE; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 22060143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The experiential blink: Mapping the cost of working memory encoding onto conscious perception in the attentional blink.
    Pincham HL; Bowman H; Szucs D
    Cortex; 2016 Aug; 81():35-49. PubMed ID: 27176633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task switching mediates direct interference of intertarget distractors in the attentional blink: An event-related potential study.
    Brisson B
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jul; 52(7):919-32. PubMed ID: 25712465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink.
    Stein T; Vallines I; Schneider WX
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1277-81. PubMed ID: 18695507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Backward masking interrupts spatial attention, slows downstream processing, and limits conscious perception.
    Losier T; Lefebvre C; Doro M; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Sep; 54():101-113. PubMed ID: 28410866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A moving overlay shrinks the attentional blink.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):173-89. PubMed ID: 25245077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mo' money, mo' problems: Monetary motivation can exacerbate the attentional blink.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Mitroff SR
    Perception; 2015; 44(4):410-22. PubMed ID: 26492726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting the spread of sparing in the attentional blink.
    Chen X; Zhou X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1596-607. PubMed ID: 25828464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masking of a first target in the attentional blink attenuates the P3 to the first target and delays the P3 to the second target.
    Brisson B; Bourassa MÈ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jul; 51(7):611-9. PubMed ID: 24635583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal constraints on conscious vision: on the ubiquitous nature of the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenstein M; Van der Burg E; Theeuwes J; Wyble B; Potter M
    J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):18.1-14. PubMed ID: 19761351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
    Xu X; Liu C
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of spatial switching in the attentional blink.
    Berthet V; Kouider S
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Mar; 15(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22379692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: Behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection.
    Giesbrecht B; Sy JL; Lewis MK
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1378-88. PubMed ID: 18396308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks.
    Rusconi P; Huber DE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739. PubMed ID: 29030758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink.
    Du F; Yang J; Yin Y; Zhang K; Abrams RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):944-50. PubMed ID: 23444107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distracting the mind improves performance: an ERP Study.
    Wierda SM; van Rijn H; Taatgen NA; Martens S
    PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e15024. PubMed ID: 21124833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual control over selective attention: evidence from a two-target method.
    MacLellan E; Shore DI; Milliken B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):556-69. PubMed ID: 25030812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alpha, beta: The rhythm of the attentional blink.
    Shapiro KL; Hanslmayr S; Enns JT; Lleras A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1862-1869. PubMed ID: 28271390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.