These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28755242)
1. Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not affect nodal harvest comparing elective procedures: a propensity score-matched analysis. Costa G; Lorenzon L; Massa G; Frezza B; Ferri M; Fransvea P; Mercantini P; Giustiniani MC; Balducci G Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1453-1461. PubMed ID: 28755242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not result in nodal understaging compared with elective surgery. Patel SV; Patel SV; Brackstone M Can J Surg; 2014 Oct; 57(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 25265110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing with indocyanine green on lymph node harvest and factors associated with inadequate lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer. Goo JJ; Ryu DG; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Kim HS; Son GM; Park BS Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 May; 54(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31071272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The positive impact of surgical quality control on adequate lymph node harvest by standardized laparoscopic surgery and national quality assessment program in colorectal cancer. Won DD; Choi SB; Lee YS; Oh ST; Kim JG; Lee IK Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 32(7):975-982. PubMed ID: 28190102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors associated with poor lymph node harvest after colon cancer surgery in a national cohort. Nedrebø BS; Søreide K; Nesbakken A; Eriksen MT; Søreide JA; Kørner H; Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e301-8. PubMed ID: 23582027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. Johnson PM; Malatjalian D; Porter GA J Gastrointest Surg; 2002; 6(6):883-88; discussion 889-90. PubMed ID: 12504228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymphadenectomy in elective and urgency surgery for resective colorectal cancer. Scabini S; Rimini E; Romairone E; Scordamaglia R; Pertile D; Ferrando V Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19365318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. D1-plus vs D2 nodal dissection in gastric cancer: a propensity score matched comparison and review of published literature. Lorenzon L; Giudicissi R; Scatizzi M; Balducci G; Cantafio S; Biondi A; Persiani R; Mercantini P; D'Ugo D BMC Surg; 2020 Jun; 20(1):126. PubMed ID: 32522177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer. Lavanchy JL; Vaisnora L; Haltmeier T; Zlobec I; Brügger LE; Candinas D; Schnüriger B Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2091-2099. PubMed ID: 31709491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective analysis of resected primary colorectal cancer revealed no correlation between node harvest and node involvement. Khan KH; Rathore MA; Bhatti MI; Hand E; Allen D; Ismail M; Tham TC; Loughlin V J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Dec; 61(12):1202-5. PubMed ID: 22355967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of postoperative complications on late recurrence and distant metastasis in patients previously treated with elective, curative resection of colorectal carcinoma]. Zsoldos P; Hegedüs L; Issekutz A; Oláh A Magy Seb; 2011 Apr; 64(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 21504856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Major postoperative complications following elective resection for colorectal cancer decrease long-term survival but not the time to recurrence. Odermatt M; Miskovic D; Flashman K; Khan J; Senapati A; O'Leary D; Thompson M; Parvaiz A Colorectal Dis; 2015 Feb; 17(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 25156234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery. Ascanelli S; Navarra G; Tonini G; Feo C; Zerbinati A; Pozza E; Carcoforo P Tumori; 2003; 89(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12729359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved after colo-rectal cancer surgery: A prospective single-centre study. Tonini V; Birindelli A; Bianchini S; Cervellera M; Bacchi Reggiani ML; Wheeler J; Di Saverio S Surgeon; 2020 Feb; 18(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 31324447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial. Capussotti L; Massucco P; Muratore A; Amisano M; Bima C; Zorzi D Surg Endosc; 2004 Jul; 18(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 15156384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Curative colorectal resections in patients aged 80 years and older: clinical characteristics, morbidity, mortality and risk factors. Ihedioha U; Gravante G; Lloyd G; Sangal S; Sorge R; Singh B; Chaudhri S Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 28(7):941-7. PubMed ID: 23242272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis. de'Angelis N; Abdalla S; Bianchi G; Memeo R; Charpy C; Petrucciani N; Sobhani I; Brunetti F J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29851362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal surgery in a rural setting. Tebala GD Updates Surg; 2015 Dec; 67(4):407-19. PubMed ID: 26545384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insurance status does not affect short-term outcomes after oncological colorectal surgery in Europe, but influences the use of minimally invasive techniques: a propensity score-matched analysis. Schneider MA; Rickenbacher A; Frick L; Cabalzar-Wondberg D; Käser S; Clavien PA; Turina M Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):863-872. PubMed ID: 30361827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]