221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28755242)
1. Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not affect nodal harvest comparing elective procedures: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Costa G; Lorenzon L; Massa G; Frezza B; Ferri M; Fransvea P; Mercantini P; Giustiniani MC; Balducci G
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1453-1461. PubMed ID: 28755242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not result in nodal understaging compared with elective surgery.
Patel SV; Patel SV; Brackstone M
Can J Surg; 2014 Oct; 57(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 25265110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing with indocyanine green on lymph node harvest and factors associated with inadequate lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer.
Goo JJ; Ryu DG; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Kim HS; Son GM; Park BS
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 May; 54(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31071272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The positive impact of surgical quality control on adequate lymph node harvest by standardized laparoscopic surgery and national quality assessment program in colorectal cancer.
Won DD; Choi SB; Lee YS; Oh ST; Kim JG; Lee IK
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 32(7):975-982. PubMed ID: 28190102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors associated with poor lymph node harvest after colon cancer surgery in a national cohort.
Nedrebø BS; Søreide K; Nesbakken A; Eriksen MT; Søreide JA; Kørner H;
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e301-8. PubMed ID: 23582027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.
Johnson PM; Malatjalian D; Porter GA
J Gastrointest Surg; 2002; 6(6):883-88; discussion 889-90. PubMed ID: 12504228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymphadenectomy in elective and urgency surgery for resective colorectal cancer.
Scabini S; Rimini E; Romairone E; Scordamaglia R; Pertile D; Ferrando V
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19365318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. D1-plus vs D2 nodal dissection in gastric cancer: a propensity score matched comparison and review of published literature.
Lorenzon L; Giudicissi R; Scatizzi M; Balducci G; Cantafio S; Biondi A; Persiani R; Mercantini P; D'Ugo D
BMC Surg; 2020 Jun; 20(1):126. PubMed ID: 32522177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer.
Lavanchy JL; Vaisnora L; Haltmeier T; Zlobec I; Brügger LE; Candinas D; Schnüriger B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2091-2099. PubMed ID: 31709491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective analysis of resected primary colorectal cancer revealed no correlation between node harvest and node involvement.
Khan KH; Rathore MA; Bhatti MI; Hand E; Allen D; Ismail M; Tham TC; Loughlin V
J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Dec; 61(12):1202-5. PubMed ID: 22355967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of postoperative complications on late recurrence and distant metastasis in patients previously treated with elective, curative resection of colorectal carcinoma].
Zsoldos P; Hegedüs L; Issekutz A; Oláh A
Magy Seb; 2011 Apr; 64(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 21504856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Major postoperative complications following elective resection for colorectal cancer decrease long-term survival but not the time to recurrence.
Odermatt M; Miskovic D; Flashman K; Khan J; Senapati A; O'Leary D; Thompson M; Parvaiz A
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Feb; 17(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 25156234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery.
Ascanelli S; Navarra G; Tonini G; Feo C; Zerbinati A; Pozza E; Carcoforo P
Tumori; 2003; 89(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12729359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved after colo-rectal cancer surgery: A prospective single-centre study.
Tonini V; Birindelli A; Bianchini S; Cervellera M; Bacchi Reggiani ML; Wheeler J; Di Saverio S
Surgeon; 2020 Feb; 18(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 31324447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial.
Capussotti L; Massucco P; Muratore A; Amisano M; Bima C; Zorzi D
Surg Endosc; 2004 Jul; 18(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 15156384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Curative colorectal resections in patients aged 80 years and older: clinical characteristics, morbidity, mortality and risk factors.
Ihedioha U; Gravante G; Lloyd G; Sangal S; Sorge R; Singh B; Chaudhri S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jul; 28(7):941-7. PubMed ID: 23242272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Match Analysis.
de'Angelis N; Abdalla S; Bianchi G; Memeo R; Charpy C; Petrucciani N; Sobhani I; Brunetti F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29851362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal surgery in a rural setting.
Tebala GD
Updates Surg; 2015 Dec; 67(4):407-19. PubMed ID: 26545384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of conventional laparoscopic and hand-assisted oncologic segmental colonic resection.
Ringley C; Lee YK; Iqbal A; Bocharev V; Sasson A; McBride CL; Thompson JS; Vitamvas ML; Oleynikov D
Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2137-41. PubMed ID: 17522925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insurance status does not affect short-term outcomes after oncological colorectal surgery in Europe, but influences the use of minimally invasive techniques: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Schneider MA; Rickenbacher A; Frick L; Cabalzar-Wondberg D; Käser S; Clavien PA; Turina M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):863-872. PubMed ID: 30361827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
