159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28755611)
1. Fixed and mobile-bearing total ankle prostheses: Effect on tibial bone strain.
Terrier A; Fernandes CS; Guillemin M; Crevoisier X
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Oct; 48():57-62. PubMed ID: 28755611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce strain at the proximal tibia.
Bottlang M; Erne OK; Lacatusu E; Sommers MB; Kessler O
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():105-11. PubMed ID: 16456313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are There Differences in Gait Mechanics in Patients With A Fixed Versus Mobile Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial.
Queen RM; Franck CT; Schmitt D; Adams SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 475(10):2599-2606. PubMed ID: 28589334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and experimental validation of a finite element model of total ankle replacement.
Terrier A; Larrea X; Guerdat J; Crevoisier X
J Biomech; 2014 Feb; 47(3):742-5. PubMed ID: 24393809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
Vogt JC; Saarbach C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of surgical malalignment on the contact pressures of fixed and mobile bearing knee prostheses--a biomechanical study.
Cheng CK; Huang CH; Liau JJ; Huang CH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Mar; 18(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 12620786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motion at the Tibial and Polyethylene Component Interface in a Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Replacement.
Lundeen GA; Clanton TO; Dunaway LJ; Lu M
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Aug; 37(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 27083506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.
Namba R; Graves S; Robertsson O; Furnes O; Stea S; Puig-Verdié L; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E; Sedrakyan A
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25520419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Axial Rotational Alignment in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty.
Hintermann B; Susdorf R; Krähenbühl N; Ruiz R
Foot Ankle Int; 2020 May; 41(5):521-528. PubMed ID: 31996033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized prostheses.
Graves S; Sedrakyan A; Baste V; Gioe TJ; Namba R; Martínez Cruz O; Stea S; Paxton E; Banerjee S; Isaacs AJ; Robertsson O
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):59-64. PubMed ID: 25520420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic cadaver testing of a new total ankle prosthesis model (German Ankle System).
Richter M; Zech S; Westphal R; Klimesch Y; Gosling T
Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1276-86. PubMed ID: 18173992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of tibial component malalignment on bone strain in revision total knee replacement.
Rastetter BR; Wright SJ; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Clift SE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 27006420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile-bearing insert translational and rotational kinematics in a PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Chouteau J; Lerat JL; Testa R; Moyen B; Fessy MH; Banks SA
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 19442597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sagittal tibiotalar translation and clinical outcomes in mobile and fixed-bearing total ankle replacement.
Usuelli FG; Manzi L; Brusaferri G; Neher RE; Guelfi M; Maccario C
Foot Ankle Surg; 2017 Jun; 23(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 28578801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A meta-analysis of the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty.
Wen Y; Liu D; Huang Y; Li B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Oct; 131(10):1341-50. PubMed ID: 21655969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matched comparison of kinematics in knees with mild and severe varus deformity using fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Watanabe T; Ishizuki M; Muneta T; Banks SA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):924-8. PubMed ID: 22835859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical study of the tibia in knee replacement revision.
Quílez MP; Pérez MA; Seral-García B
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2015; 59(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 25650079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spherical center axial hinge knee prosthesis causes lower contact stress on tibial insert and bushing compared with biaxial hinge knee prosthesis.
Zhang JY; Zhang HR; Tian DM; Wang F; Zhang H; Hu YC
Knee; 2021 Mar; 29():1-8. PubMed ID: 33524657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of press-fit condylar sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kulkarni SS; Kim YH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 96(19):e168. PubMed ID: 25274796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures.
Espinosa N; Walti M; Favre P; Snedeker JG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 May; 92(5):1179-87. PubMed ID: 20439664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
