314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28756558)
1. The "old" 15 mm renal stone size limit for RIRS remains a clinically significant threshold size.
Goldberg H; Golomb D; Shtabholtz Y; Tapiero S; Creiderman G; Shariv A; Baniel J; Lifhshitz D
World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1947-1954. PubMed ID: 28756558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
Erkoc M; Bozkurt M; Sezgin MA; Ozcan L; Can O; Danis E; Polat EC; Otunctemur A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2024 May; 34(5):420-424. PubMed ID: 38546503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Pelvic Stones of 2-3 cm.
Erkoc M; Bozkurt M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Jun; 31(6):605-609. PubMed ID: 33316204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).
Li Z; Lai C; Shah AK; Xie W; Liu C; Huang L; Li K; Yu H; Xu K
BMC Urol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):27. PubMed ID: 32178654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.
Bozzini G; Verze P; Arcaniolo D; Dal Piaz O; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Provenzano M; Osmolorskij B; Sanguedolce F; Montanari E; Macchione N; Pummer K; Mirone V; De Sio M; Taverna G
World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1967-1975. PubMed ID: 28875295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of retrograde intrarenal surgery for asymptomatic renal stones in patients undergoing ureteroscopy for a symptomatic ureteral stone.
Goldberg H; Holland R; Tal R; Lask DM; Livne PM; Lifshitz DA
J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):970-3. PubMed ID: 23537311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous retrograde intrarenal surgery for ipsilateral asymptomatic renal stones in patients with ureteroscopic symptomatic ureteral stone removal.
Lai D; Chen M; He Y; Li X
BMC Urol; 2015 Mar; 15():22. PubMed ID: 25888137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is RIRS emerging as the preferred option for the management of 2 cm-4 cm renal stones: our experience.
Al Busaidy SS; Kurukkal SN; Al Hooti QM; Alsaraf MS; Al Mamari SA; Al Saeedi AK
Can J Urol; 2016 Aug; 23(4):8364-7. PubMed ID: 27544560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for ≤ 2 cm renal stones.
Cui D; Ma Q; Xie S; Wang G; Li G; Chen G
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4745. PubMed ID: 38413652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones Greater than 2 cm.
Koyuncu H; Yencilek F; Kalkan M; Bastug Y; Yencilek E; Ozdemir AT
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 26005965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The surgical experience influences the safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: a propensity score analysis.
Berardinelli F; Cindolo L; De Francesco P; Proietti S; Hennessey D; Dalpiaz O; Cracco CM; Pellegrini F; Scoffone CM; Schips L; Giusti G
Urolithiasis; 2017 Aug; 45(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 27638520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treating 20-40 mm Renal Stones.
Atis G; Culpan M; Pelit ES; Canakci C; Ulus I; Gunaydin B; Yildirim A; Caskurlu T
Urol J; 2017 Mar; 14(2):2995-2999. PubMed ID: 28299761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrograde intrarenal surgery as second-line therapy yields a lower success rate.
Holland R; Margel D; Livne PM; Lask DM; Lifshitz DA
J Endourol; 2006 Aug; 20(8):556-9. PubMed ID: 16903814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde intrarenal surgery using ureteral access sheaths is a safe and effective treatment for renal stones in children weighing <20 kg.
Berrettini A; Boeri L; Montanari E; Mogiatti M; Acquati P; De Lorenzis E; Gallioli A; De Marco EA; Minoli DG; Manzoni G
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Feb; 14(1):59.e1-59.e6. PubMed ID: 29195830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones.
Kandemir A; Guven S; Balasar M; Sonmez MG; Taskapu H; Gurbuz R
World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 28589217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which Should be Preferred for Moderate-Size Kidney Stones? Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery?
Demirbas A; Resorlu B; Sunay MM; Karakan T; Karagöz MA; Doluoglu OG
J Endourol; 2016 Dec; 30(12):1285-1289. PubMed ID: 27706948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.
ElSheemy MS; Elmarakbi AA; Hytham M; Ibrahim H; Khadgi S; Al-Kandari AM
Urolithiasis; 2019 Apr; 47(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 29549382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones up to 2 cm in patients with solitary kidney: a single centre experience.
Bai Y; Wang X; Yang Y; Han P; Wang J
BMC Urol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 28100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
