372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28757260)
1. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of primary endpoints between publications, registries, and protocols of phase III cancer clinical trials.
Liang F; Guo X; Zhang S; Xue H; Chen Q; Hu X
Oncotarget; 2017 Nov; 8(57):97648-97656. PubMed ID: 29228640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.
Perlmutter AS; Tran VT; Dechartres A; Ravaud P
Ann Oncol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 28011448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology.
Raghav KP; Mahajan S; Yao JC; Hobbs BP; Berry DA; Pentz RD; Tam A; Hong WK; Ellis LM; Abbruzzese J; Overman MJ
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(31):3583-90. PubMed ID: 26304898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Eligibility Criteria Between Protocols, Registries, and Publications of Cancer Clinical Trials.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W; Tannock I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Nov; 108(11):. PubMed ID: 27226519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome discrepancies and selective reporting: impacting the leading journals?
Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Dwan K; Pandis N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127495. PubMed ID: 25996928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Making protocols available with the article improved evaluation of selective outcome reporting.
Calméjane L; Dechartres A; Tran VT; Ravaud P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():95-102. PubMed ID: 30196127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials.
Vassar M; Roberts W; Cooper CM; Wayant C; Bibens M
Addiction; 2020 Jun; 115(6):1172-1179. PubMed ID: 31743532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
Pranić S; Marušić A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials.
Sendyk DI; Souza NV; César Neto JB; Tatakis DN; Pannuti CM
J Clin Periodontol; 2021 Jun; 48(6):867-877. PubMed ID: 33745136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
Wayant C; Scheckel C; Hicks C; Nissen T; Leduc L; Som M; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178379. PubMed ID: 28570573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
