BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28757260)

  • 1. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
    Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of primary endpoints between publications, registries, and protocols of phase III cancer clinical trials.
    Liang F; Guo X; Zhang S; Xue H; Chen Q; Hu X
    Oncotarget; 2017 Nov; 8(57):97648-97656. PubMed ID: 29228640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.
    Perlmutter AS; Tran VT; Dechartres A; Ravaud P
    Ann Oncol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 28011448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology.
    Raghav KP; Mahajan S; Yao JC; Hobbs BP; Berry DA; Pentz RD; Tam A; Hong WK; Ellis LM; Abbruzzese J; Overman MJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(31):3583-90. PubMed ID: 26304898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
    Rongen JJ; Hannink G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
    Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
    Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
    Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
    JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
    Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Eligibility Criteria Between Protocols, Registries, and Publications of Cancer Clinical Trials.
    Zhang S; Liang F; Li W; Tannock I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Nov; 108(11):. PubMed ID: 27226519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome discrepancies and selective reporting: impacting the leading journals?
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Dwan K; Pandis N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127495. PubMed ID: 25996928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making protocols available with the article improved evaluation of selective outcome reporting.
    Calméjane L; Dechartres A; Tran VT; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():95-102. PubMed ID: 30196127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
    Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
    Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
    Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
    Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials.
    Vassar M; Roberts W; Cooper CM; Wayant C; Bibens M
    Addiction; 2020 Jun; 115(6):1172-1179. PubMed ID: 31743532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
    Pranić S; Marušić A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration.
    Scott A; Rucklidge JJ; Mulder RT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133718. PubMed ID: 26287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials.
    Sendyk DI; Souza NV; César Neto JB; Tatakis DN; Pannuti CM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2021 Jun; 48(6):867-877. PubMed ID: 33745136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
    Wayant C; Scheckel C; Hicks C; Nissen T; Leduc L; Som M; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178379. PubMed ID: 28570573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
    Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.