773 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28757305)
1. Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains.
Gordon EM; Laumann TO; Gilmore AW; Newbold DJ; Greene DJ; Berg JJ; Ortega M; Hoyt-Drazen C; Gratton C; Sun H; Hampton JM; Coalson RS; Nguyen AL; McDermott KB; Shimony JS; Snyder AZ; Schlaggar BL; Petersen SE; Nelson SM; Dosenbach NUF
Neuron; 2017 Aug; 95(4):791-807.e7. PubMed ID: 28757305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structure-function relationships during segregated and integrated network states of human brain functional connectivity.
Fukushima M; Betzel RF; He Y; van den Heuvel MP; Zuo XN; Sporns O
Brain Struct Funct; 2018 Apr; 223(3):1091-1106. PubMed ID: 29090337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correspondence between evoked and intrinsic functional brain network configurations.
Bolt T; Nomi JS; Rubinov M; Uddin LQ
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Apr; 38(4):1992-2007. PubMed ID: 28052450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State.
Geerligs L; Rubinov M; Cam-Can ; Henson RN
J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 35(41):13949-61. PubMed ID: 26468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual Identification Using the Functional Brain Fingerprint Detected by the Recurrent Neural Network.
Chen S; Hu X
Brain Connect; 2018 May; 8(4):197-204. PubMed ID: 29634323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Rest Really Rest? Resting-State Functional Connectivity During Rest and Motor Task Paradigms.
Jurkiewicz MT; Crawley AP; Mikulis DJ
Brain Connect; 2018 Jun; 8(5):268-275. PubMed ID: 29665711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PAGANI Toolkit: Parallel graph-theoretical analysis package for brain network big data.
Du H; Xia M; Zhao K; Liao X; Yang H; Wang Y; He Y
Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 May; 39(5):1869-1885. PubMed ID: 29417688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hubs of Anticorrelation in High-Resolution Resting-State Functional Connectivity Network Architecture.
Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Cabanban R; Crosson BA
Brain Connect; 2015 Jun; 5(5):267-75. PubMed ID: 25744222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test-retest reliability of functional connectivity networks during naturalistic fMRI paradigms.
Wang J; Ren Y; Hu X; Nguyen VT; Guo L; Han J; Guo CC
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Apr; 38(4):2226-2241. PubMed ID: 28094464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Working memory capacity and the functional connectome - insights from resting-state fMRI and voxelwise centrality mapping.
Markett S; Reuter M; Heeren B; Lachmann B; Weber B; Montag C
Brain Imaging Behav; 2018 Feb; 12(1):238-246. PubMed ID: 28247158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Global signal regression strengthens association between resting-state functional connectivity and behavior.
Li J; Kong R; Liégeois R; Orban C; Tan Y; Sun N; Holmes AJ; Sabuncu MR; Ge T; Yeo BTT
Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():126-141. PubMed ID: 30974241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic Functional Connectivity States Between the Dorsal and Ventral Sensorimotor Networks Revealed by Dynamic Conditional Correlation Analysis of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Syed MF; Lindquist MA; Pillai JJ; Agarwal S; Gujar SK; Choe AS; Caffo B; Sair HI
Brain Connect; 2017 Dec; 7(10):635-642. PubMed ID: 28969437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative comparison of resting-state functional connectivity derived from fNIRS and fMRI: a simultaneous recording study.
Duan L; Zhang YJ; Zhu CZ
Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2008-18. PubMed ID: 22366082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of negative correlations in brain connectivity.
Zhan L; Jenkins LM; Wolfson OE; GadElkarim JJ; Nocito K; Thompson PM; Ajilore OA; Chung MK; Leow AD
J Comp Neurol; 2017 Oct; 525(15):3251-3265. PubMed ID: 28675490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional brain hubs and their test-retest reliability: a multiband resting-state functional MRI study.
Liao XH; Xia MR; Xu T; Dai ZJ; Cao XY; Niu HJ; Zuo XN; Zang YF; He Y
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():969-82. PubMed ID: 23899725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Joint embedding: A scalable alignment to compare individuals in a connectivity space.
Nenning KH; Xu T; Schwartz E; Arroyo J; Woehrer A; Franco AR; Vogelstein JT; Margulies DS; Liu H; Smallwood J; Milham MP; Langs G
Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():117232. PubMed ID: 32771618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Network-specific effects of age and in-scanner subject motion: a resting-state fMRI study of 238 healthy adults.
Mowinckel AM; Espeseth T; Westlye LT
Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1364-73. PubMed ID: 22992492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parcellating an individual subject's cortical and subcortical brain structures using snowball sampling of resting-state correlations.
Wig GS; Laumann TO; Cohen AL; Power JD; Nelson SM; Glasser MF; Miezin FM; Snyder AZ; Schlaggar BL; Petersen SE
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Aug; 24(8):2036-54. PubMed ID: 23476025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced subject-specific resting-state network detection and extraction with fast fMRI.
Akin B; Lee HL; Hennig J; LeVan P
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Feb; 38(2):817-830. PubMed ID: 27696603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrinsic Brain Hub Connectivity Underlies Individual Differences in Spatial Working Memory.
Liu J; Xia M; Dai Z; Wang X; Liao X; Bi Y; He Y
Cereb Cortex; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5496-5508. PubMed ID: 28334075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
