These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28758233)
1. Exploring examinee behaviours as validity evidence for multiple-choice question examinations. Surry LT; Torre D; Durning SJ Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 51(10):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 28758233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mixed-methods exploration of cognitive dispositions to respond and clinical reasoning errors with multiple choice questions. Surry LT; Torre D; Trowbridge RL; Durning SJ BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):277. PubMed ID: 30470223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Justify Your Answer: The Role of Written Think Aloud in Script Concordance Testing. Power A; Lemay JF; Cooke S Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27662118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study. Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring Clinical Reasoning Strategies and Test-Taking Behaviors During Clinical Vignette Style Multiple-Choice Examinations: A Mixed Methods Study. Heist BS; Gonzalo JD; Durning S; Torre D; Elnicki DM J Grad Med Educ; 2014 Dec; 6(4):709-14. PubMed ID: 26140123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study. Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pilot survey of student perceptions on the benefit of the OSCE and MCQ modalities. Müller S; Settmacher U; Koch I; Dahmen U GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(4):Doc51. PubMed ID: 30539076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sound Practices: An Exploratory Study of Building and Monitoring Multiple-Choice Exams at Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education Programs. St-Onge C; Young M; Renaud JS; Cummings BA; Drescher O; Varpio L Acad Med; 2021 Feb; 96(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 32769474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple-choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship. Kelly W; Durning S; Denton G Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 22775780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations. Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between anxiety and standardized patient test performance in the medicine clerkship. Reteguiz JA J Gen Intern Med; 2006 May; 21(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 16704380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pushing Critical Thinking Skills With Multiple-Choice Questions: Does Bloom's Taxonomy Work? Zaidi NLB; Grob KL; Monrad SM; Kurtz JB; Tai A; Ahmed AZ; Gruppen LD; Santen SA Acad Med; 2018 Jun; 93(6):856-859. PubMed ID: 29215375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observable phenomena that reveal medical students' clinical reasoning ability during expert assessment of their history taking: a qualitative study. Haring CM; Cools BM; van Gurp PJM; van der Meer JWM; Postma CT BMC Med Educ; 2017 Aug; 17(1):147. PubMed ID: 28851340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using Self-Regulated Learning Microanalysis to Examine Regulatory Processes in Clerkship Students Engaged in Practice Questions. Andrews MA; Okuliar CA; Whelton SA; Windels AO; Kruse SR; Nachnani MG; Topol DA; McBee EC; Stein MT; Singaraju RC; Gao SW; Oliver DS; Mangal JP; LaRochelle JS; Kelly WF; DeZee KJ; Chen HC; Artino AR; Hemmer PA; Dong T; Cleary TJ; Durning SJ Perspect Med Educ; 2023; 12(1):385-398. PubMed ID: 37840648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do medical students actually think while solving problems in three different types of clinical assessments in Korea: Clinical performance examination (CPX), multimedia case-based assessment (CBA), and modified essay question (MEQ). Kim S; Choi I; Yoon BY; Kwon MJ; Choi SJ; Kim SH; Lee JT; Rhee BD J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2019; 16():10. PubMed ID: 31071764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of English Language on Multiple Choice Question Scores of Thai Medical Students. Phisalprapa P; Muangkaew W; Assanasen J; Kunavisarut T; Thongngarm T; Ruchutrakool T; Kobwanthanakun S; Dejsomritrutai W J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 27396231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the validity of assessment in anatomy: do images influence cognitive processes used in answering extended matching questions? Vorstenbosch MA; Bouter ST; van den Hurk MM; Kooloos JG; Bolhuis SM; Laan RF Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23813919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance. McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Enhancement-focused framework for developing high quality single best answer multiple choice questions. AlMahmoud T; Elzubeir MA; Shaban S; Branicki F Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 26996644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual processing theory and experts' reasoning: exploring thinking on national multiple-choice questions. Durning SJ; Dong T; Artino AR; van der Vleuten C; Holmboe E; Schuwirth L Perspect Med Educ; 2015 Aug; 4(4):168-175. PubMed ID: 26243535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]