448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28758379)
1. External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.
Lee JY; Chung YS; Na K; Kim HM; Park CK; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT; Kim HS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e73. PubMed ID: 28758379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.
Böhm S; Faruqi A; Said I; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Jeyarajah A; Fitzpatrick A; Ennis D; Dowe T; Santos JL; Cook LS; Tinker AV; Le ND; Gilks CB; Singh N
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2457-63. PubMed ID: 26124480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of a Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) System for Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma (HGSC).
Ditzel HM; Strickland KC; Meserve EE; Stover E; Konstantinopoulos PA; Matulonis UA; Muto MG; Liu JF; Feltmate C; Horowitz N; Berkowitz RS; Gupta M; Hecht JL; Lin DI; Jochumsen KM; Welch WR; Hirsch MS; Quade BJ; Lee KR; Crum CP; Mutter GL; Nucci MR; Howitt BE
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 May; 38(3):230-240. PubMed ID: 29750700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The chemotherapy response score is a useful histological predictor of prognosis in high-grade serous carcinoma.
Singh P; Kaushal V; Rai B; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Dey P; Garg R; Rohilla M; Suri V; Ghoshal S; Srinivasan R
Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 28914967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Role of Histological Tumor Regression in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Serous Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma.
Coghlan E; Meniawy TM; Munro A; Bulsara M; Stewart CJ; Tan A; Koay MHE; MaGee D; Codde J; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Leung Y; Nichols CB; Cohen PA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 28441251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Cohen PA; Powell A; Böhm S; Gilks CB; Stewart CJR; Meniawy TM; Bulsara M; Avril S; Brockbank EC; Bosse T; de Azevedo Focchi GR; Ganesan R; Glasspool RM; Howitt BE; Kim HS; Lee JY; Le ND; Lockley M; Manchanda R; Mandalia T; McCluggage WG; McNeish I; Midha D; Srinivasan R; Tan YY; van der Griend R; Yunokawa M; Zannoni GF; ; Singh N
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31118141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response.
Zorzato PC; Zannoni GF; Tudisco R; Pasciuto T; Di Giorgio A; Franchi M; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 31754067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Non-High Grade Serous Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Single-Institution Experience.
Chung YS; Lee JY; Kim HS; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2018 Oct; 59(8):930-936. PubMed ID: 30187699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?
Lawson BC; Euscher ED; Bassett RL; Liu J; Ramalingam P; Zhong Y; Fleming ND; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 31651523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma.
Rajkumar S; Polson A; Nath R; Lane G; Sayasneh A; Jakes A; Begum S; Mehra G
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 151(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30197060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal primary management of bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma: Are the only options complete gross resection at primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
Sioulas VD; Schiavone MB; Kadouri D; Zivanovic O; Roche KL; O'Cearbhaill R; Abu-Rustum NR; Levine DA; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Leitao MM; Chi DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28238354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Ki-67 Labeling Index on Prognostic Significance of the Chemotherapy Response Score in Women With Tubo-ovarian Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Heayn M; Skvarca LB; Zhu L; Edwards RP; Olawaiye AB; Modugno F; Elishaev E; Bhargava R
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2021 May; 40(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 32897953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chemotherapy-associated foam cell aggregates as a prognostic factor in patients with pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Kojima N; Kuno I; Ushigusa T; Kato T; Yoshida H
Virchows Arch; 2020 Sep; 477(3):429-436. PubMed ID: 32103350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PD-L1 Expression and CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Different Types of Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma and Their Prognostic Value in High-grade Serous Carcinoma.
Chen H; Molberg K; Strickland AL; Castrillon DH; Carrick K; Jiang Q; Niu S; Rivera-Colon G; Gwin K; Hinson S; Lea J; Miller DS; Zheng W; Lucas E
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):1050-1060. PubMed ID: 32384321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential risk factors associated with prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients.
Zhang J; Liu N; Zhang A; Bao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1808-1816. PubMed ID: 30019801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ovarian Low-grade Serous Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic Study of 33 Cases With Primary Surgery Performed at a Single Institution.
Okoye E; Euscher ED; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 May; 40(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 26900814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of non-high grade serous carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Korean gynecologic oncology group study (OV 1708).
Chung YS; Park SY; Lee JY; Park JY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Suh DS; Kim YH; Lee JM; Kim M; Choi MC; Shim SH; Lee KH; Song T; Hong JH; Lee WM; Lee B; Lee IH
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):341. PubMed ID: 30971221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ascites regression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in prediction of treatment outcome among stage IIIc to IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Xu X; Deng F; Lv M; Ren B; Guo W; Chen X
J Ovarian Res; 2016 Dec; 9(1):85. PubMed ID: 27912779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials.
Vergote I; Coens C; Nankivell M; Kristensen GB; Parmar MKB; Ehlen T; Jayson GC; Johnson N; Swart AM; Verheijen R; McCluggage WG; Perren T; Panici PB; Kenter G; Casado A; Mendiola C; Stuart G; Reed NS; Kehoe S; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1680-1687. PubMed ID: 30413383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients Undergoing Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian, Tubal, or Peritoneal Cancer.
Kaban A; Topuz S; Saip P; Sozen H; Celebi K; Salihoglu Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Dec; 39(12):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 28784563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
