168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28758777)
1. Reading dilemmas in a foreign language reduces both deontological and utilitarian response tendencies.
Muda R; Niszczota P; Białek M; Conway P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 28758777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
Reynolds CJ; Conway P
Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1009-1023. PubMed ID: 29389202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who is deontological? Completing moral dilemmas in front of mirrors increases deontological but not utilitarian response tendencies.
Reynolds CJ; Knighten KR; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103993. PubMed ID: 31229738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are people really less moral in their foreign language? Proficiency and comprehension matter for the moral foreign language effect in Russian speakers.
Kirova A; Tang Y; Conway P
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0287789. PubMed ID: 37428758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thinking More or Feeling Less? Explaining the Foreign-Language Effect on Moral Judgment.
Hayakawa S; Tannenbaum D; Costa A; Corey JD; Keysar B
Psychol Sci; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1387-1397. PubMed ID: 28806137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies.
Byrd N; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103995. PubMed ID: 31301587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Instrumentality and Personal Force on Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Harm-Related Moral Dilemmas.
Ludwig J; Reisenzein R; Hiemisch A
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1222. PubMed ID: 32636781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testosterone and cortisol do not predict rejecting harm or maximizing outcomes in sacrificial moral dilemmas: A preregistered analysis.
Reynolds CJ; Makhanova A; Nikonova L; Eckel LA; Conway P
Horm Behav; 2021 Nov; 136():105063. PubMed ID: 34598057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
Kahane G
Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Not all bilinguals are the same: A meta-analysis of the moral foreign language effect.
Stankovic M; Biedermann B; Hamamura T
Brain Lang; 2022 Apr; 227():105082. PubMed ID: 35093765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. (How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Decisions.
Goldstein-Greenwood J; Conway P; Summerville A; Johnson BN
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1303-1317. PubMed ID: 31989859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deontological Dilemma Response Tendencies and Sensorimotor Representations of Harm to Others.
Christov-Moore L; Conway P; Iacoboni M
Front Integr Neurosci; 2017; 11():34. PubMed ID: 29311859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Would You Sacrifice Yourself to Save Five Lives? Processing a Foreign Language Increases the Odds of Self-Sacrifice in Moral Dilemmas.
Romero-Rivas C; López-Benítez R; Rodríguez-Cuadrado S
Psychol Rep; 2022 Feb; 125(1):498-516. PubMed ID: 33100135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures.
Patil I; Zucchelli MM; Kool W; Campbell S; Fornasier F; Calò M; Silani G; Cikara M; Cushman F
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):443-460. PubMed ID: 31916813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The behavioral ecology of moral dilemmas: Childhood unpredictability, but not harshness, predicts less deontological and utilitarian responding.
Maranges HM; Hasty CR; Maner JK; Conway P
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Jun; 120(6):1696-1719. PubMed ID: 33507783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do affective episodes modulate moral judgment in individuals with bipolar disorder?
Gago B; Perea M; Sierra P; Livianos L; Cañada-Martínez A; García-Blanco A
J Affect Disord; 2019 Feb; 245():289-296. PubMed ID: 30419529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foreign Language Effect and Psychological Distance.
Shin HI; Kim J
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 28516209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
