185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28758969)
1. Assessment of Bone Metastases in Patients with Prostate Cancer-A Comparison between
Thomas L; Balmus C; Ahmadzadehfar H; Essler M; Strunk H; Bundschuh RA
Pharmaceuticals (Basel); 2017 Jul; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 28758969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Head-To-Head Comparison of
Zhao G; Ji B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic accuracy of
Daniels H; Gilbert R; Bonin L
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Sep; 54(3):545-555. PubMed ID: 37211439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hybrid
Janssen JC; Meißner S; Woythal N; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):610-619. PubMed ID: 28779400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraindividual Comparison of
Rathke H; Afshar-Oromieh A; Giesel FL; Kremer C; Flechsig P; Haufe S; Mier W; Holland-Letz T; De Bucourt M; Armor T; Babich JW; Haberkorn U; Kratochwil C
J Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 29371410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added value of
Zacho HD; Ravn S; Afshar-Oromieh A; Fledelius J; Ejlersen JA; Petersen LJ
EJNMMI Res; 2020 Apr; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 32270300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct comparison of
Albalooshi B; Al Sharhan M; Bagheri F; Miyanath S; Ray B; Muhasin M; Zakavi SR
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2020; 8(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 32064277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic sensitivity of Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate carcinoma: A comparative analysis with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Lawal IO; Ankrah AO; Mokgoro NP; Vorster M; Maes A; Sathekge MM
Prostate; 2017 Aug; 77(11):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 28649735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Sachpekidis C; Bäumer P; Kopka K; Hadaschik BA; Hohenfellner M; Kopp-Schneider A; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jun; 45(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29362859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [
Hirmas N; Al-Ibraheem A; Herrmann K; Alsharif A; Muhsin H; Khader J; Al-Daghmin A; Salah S
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 30215174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of PSMA PET/CT imaging using a 68Ga-HBED-CC ligand in patients with prostate cancer and the value of early pelvic imaging.
Kabasakal L; Demirci E; Ocak M; Akyel R; Nematyazar J; Aygun A; Halac M; Talat Z; Araman A
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jun; 36(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 25738559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Zacho HD; Nielsen JB; Haberkorn U; Stenholt L; Petersen LJ
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 29082604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head to head comparison performance of
García-Pérez FO; Davanzo J; López-Buenrostro S; Santos-Cuevas C; Ferro-Flores G; Jímenez-Ríos MA; Scavuzzo A; Santana-Ríos Z; Medina-Ornelas S
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018; 8(5):332-340. PubMed ID: 30510850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients.
Uslu-Beşli L; Sağer S; Akgün E; Asa S; Şahin OE; Demirdağ Ç; Güner E; Khosroshahi BR; Karayel E; Pehlivanoğlu H; Aygün A; Uslu İ; Talat Z; Sönmezoğlu K
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 49(1):301-310. PubMed ID: 30761859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial experience of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in evaluation of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients.
Natarajan A; Agrawal A; Murthy V; Bakshi G; Joshi A; Purandare N; Shah S; Puranik A; Rangarajan V
World J Nucl Med; 2019; 18(3):244-250. PubMed ID: 31516367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Huynh THV; Klausen TW; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Pedersen EM; Pedersen M; Thomsen HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 30132104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PSA-stratified detection rates for [
Derlin T; Schmuck S; Juhl C; Zörgiebel J; Schneefeld SM; Walte ACA; Hueper K; von Klot CA; Henkenberens C; Christiansen H; Thackeray JT; Ross TL; Bengel FM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jun; 45(6):913-922. PubMed ID: 29308527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
