These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28759991)

  • 1. In Silico Prediction of Ligand Binding Energies in Multiple Therapeutic Targets and Diverse Ligand Sets-A Case Study on BACE1, TYK2, HSP90, and PERK Proteins.
    Frush EH; Sekharan S; Keinan S
    J Phys Chem B; 2017 Aug; 121(34):8142-8148. PubMed ID: 28759991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
    Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards full Quantum-Mechanics-based Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.
    Ehrlich S; Göller AH; Grimme S
    Chemphyschem; 2017 Apr; 18(8):898-905. PubMed ID: 28133881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate and Reliable Prediction of the Binding Affinities of Macrocycles to Their Protein Targets.
    Yu HS; Deng Y; Wu Y; Sindhikara D; Rask AR; Kimura T; Abel R; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):6290-6300. PubMed ID: 29120625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blinded predictions of binding modes and energies of HSP90-α ligands for the 2015 D3R grand challenge.
    Mey ASJS; Juárez-Jiménez J; Hennessy A; Michel J
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2016 Oct; 24(20):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 27485604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment and acceleration of binding energy calculations for protein-ligand complexes by the fragment molecular orbital method.
    Otsuka T; Okimoto N; Taiji M
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Nov; 36(30):2209-18. PubMed ID: 26400829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced ligand sampling for relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.
    Kaus JW; McCammon JA
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 May; 119(20):6190-7. PubMed ID: 25906170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC; Langley DR; Kang J; Huang H; Kulkarni A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Free energy calculations to estimate ligand-binding affinities in structure-based drug design.
    Reddy MR; Reddy CR; Rathore RS; Erion MD; Aparoy P; Reddy RN; Reddanna P
    Curr Pharm Des; 2014; 20(20):3323-37. PubMed ID: 23947646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
    Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined MD/QTAIM techniques to evaluate ligand-receptor interactions. Scope and limitations.
    Rojas S; Parravicini O; Vettorazzi M; Tosso R; Garro A; Gutiérrez L; Andújar S; Enriz R
    Eur J Med Chem; 2020 Dec; 208():112792. PubMed ID: 32949964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absolute Binding Free Energies with OneOPES.
    Karrenbrock M; Borsatto A; Rizzi V; Lukauskis D; Aureli S; Luigi Gervasio F
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2024 Oct; 15(39):9871-9880. PubMed ID: 39302888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):685-693. PubMed ID: 27484214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conformational transition in the substrate binding domain of β-secretase exploited by NMA and its implication in inhibitor recognition: BACE1-myricetin a case study.
    Chakraborty S; Kumar S; Basu S
    Neurochem Int; 2011 Jul; 58(8):914-23. PubMed ID: 21354237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ligand Binding, Unbinding, and Allosteric Effects: Deciphering Small-Molecule Modulation of HSP90.
    D'Annessa I; Raniolo S; Limongelli V; Di Marino D; Colombo G
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Nov; 15(11):6368-6381. PubMed ID: 31538783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
    van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of sampling on BACE-1 ligands binding free energy predictions via MM-PBSA calculations.
    Chéron N; Shakhnovich EI
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Aug; 38(22):1941-1951. PubMed ID: 28568844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
    Jain T; Jayaram B
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An electronic environment and contact direction sensitive scoring function for predicting affinities of protein-ligand complexes in Contour(®).
    Lindblom PR; Wu G; Liu Z; Jim KC; Baldwin JJ; Gregg RE; Claremon DA; Singh SB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():118-127. PubMed ID: 25123650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.