These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28760478)

  • 1. Engaging the Senses, Understanding Publics: Research Methods, Science Engagement, and Synthetic Biology.
    Meckin R; Balmer A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1015-1017. PubMed ID: 28760478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Courses Based on iGEM/BIOMOD Competitions Are the Ideal Format for Research-Based Learning of Xenobiology.
    Schmitt FJ; Frielingsdorf S; Friedrich T; Budisa N
    Chembiochem; 2021 Mar; 22(5):818-825. PubMed ID: 33191631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. iGEM and the Biotechnology Workforce of the Future.
    Warmbrod KL; Trotochaud M; Gronvall GK
    Health Secur; 2020; 18(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 32816589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promoting microbiology education through the iGEM synthetic biology competition.
    Kelwick R; Bowater L; Yeoman KH; Bowater RP
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2015 Aug; 362(16):. PubMed ID: 26260156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deconstructing synthetic biology across scales: a conceptual approach for training synthetic biologists.
    Karim AS; Brown DM; Archuleta CM; Grannan S; Aristilde L; Goyal Y; Leonard JN; Mangan NM; Prindle A; Rocklin GJ; Tyo KJ; Zoloth L; Jewett MC; Calkins S; Kamat NP; Tullman-Ercek D; Lucks JB
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jun; 15(1):5425. PubMed ID: 38926339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Playing God and tampering with nature: popular labels for real concerns in synthetic biology.
    Carter L; Mankad A; Hobman EV; Porter NB
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Apr; 30(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 33502671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Public Engagement in Bioengineering and Synthetic Biology Improving Research Outcomes?
    Carter L; Mankad A; Hobman EV
    OMICS; 2023 Feb; 27(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 36706439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Words, images and gender: Lessons from a survey on the public perception of synthetic biology and related disciplines.
    Porcar M; Latorre-Pérez A; Molina-Menor E; Domínguez M
    EMBO Rep; 2019 Jul; 20(7):e48401. PubMed ID: 31267633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building better scientists through cross-disciplinary collaboration in synthetic biology: A report from the Genome Consortium for Active Teaching Workshop 2010.
    Wolyniak MJ; Alvarez CJ; Chandrasekaran V; Grana TM; Holgado A; Jones CJ; Morris RW; Pereira AL; Stamm J; Washington TM; Yang Y
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 21123684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A public policy on biotechnology education: what might be relevant and effective?
    Braun R; Moses V
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 15(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 15193334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equipping scientists for the new biology.
    Aebersold R; Hood LE; Watts JD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):359. PubMed ID: 10748470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Let's (not) talk about synthetic biology: Framing an emerging technology in public and stakeholder dialogues.
    Bauer A; Bogner A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(5):492-507. PubMed ID: 32122265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A life scientist, an engineer and a social scientist walk into a lab: challenges of dual-use engagement and education in synthetic biology.
    Edwards B; Kelle A
    Med Confl Surviv; 2012; 28(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 22606757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthetic biology: from mainstream to counterculture.
    Sleator RD
    Arch Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 198(7):711-3. PubMed ID: 27316777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Vision for Teaching the Values of Synthetic Biology.
    Farny NG
    Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1097-1100. PubMed ID: 30170875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthetic biology: regulating industry uses of new biotechnologies.
    Erickson B; Singh R; Winters P
    Science; 2011 Sep; 333(6047):1254-6. PubMed ID: 21885775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthetic biology: Cultural divide.
    Nelson B
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7499):152-4. PubMed ID: 24805328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dilemma of raising awareness "responsibly": The need to discuss controversial research with the public raises a conundrum for scientists: when is the right time to start public debates?
    Nerlich B; McLeod C
    EMBO Rep; 2016 Apr; 17(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 26988254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stakeholders' rationales for representing uncertainties of biotechnological research.
    Post S; Maier M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):944-960. PubMed ID: 27129955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.