These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28760952)

  • 1. Testing inhomogeneous solvation theory in structure-based ligand discovery.
    Balius TE; Fischer M; Stein RM; Adler TB; Nguyen CN; Cruz A; Gilson MK; Kurtzman T; Shoichet BK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Aug; 114(33):E6839-E6846. PubMed ID: 28760952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AutoDock-GIST: Incorporating Thermodynamics of Active-Site Water into Scoring Function for Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking.
    Uehara S; Tanaka S
    Molecules; 2016 Nov; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 27886114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril.
    Nguyen CN; Young TK; Gilson MK
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jul; 137(4):044101. PubMed ID: 22852591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roles for ordered and bulk solvent in ligand recognition and docking in two related cavities.
    Barelier S; Boyce SE; Fish I; Fischer M; Goodin DB; Shoichet BK
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69153. PubMed ID: 23874896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models.
    Lindström A; Edvinsson L; Johansson A; Andersson CD; Andersson IE; Raubacher F; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 21309544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Dec; 33(12):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 31463704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
    Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating replacement free energy of binding-site waters in molecular docking.
    Sun H; Zhao L; Peng S; Huang N
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):1765-76. PubMed ID: 24549784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
    Graves AP; Shivakumar DM; Boyce SE; Jacobson MP; Case DA; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(3):914-34. PubMed ID: 18280498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.
    Wei BQ; Baase WA; Weaver LH; Matthews BW; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Sep; 322(2):339-55. PubMed ID: 12217695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy penalties enhance flexible receptor docking in a model cavity.
    Kamenik AS; Singh I; Lak P; Balius TE; Liedl KR; Shoichet BK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(36):. PubMed ID: 34475217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of ligand binding with the inclusion of solvation effect.
    Yan Z; Wang J
    Proteins; 2015 Sep; 83(9):1632-42. PubMed ID: 26111900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory for cross-solvation in rigid solvents.
    Waibl F; Kraml J; Hoerschinger VJ; Hofer F; Kamenik AS; Fernández-Quintero ML; Liedl KR
    J Chem Phys; 2022 May; 156(20):204101. PubMed ID: 35649837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein-Ligand Complex Solvation Thermodynamics: Development, Parameterization, and Testing of GIST-Based Solvent Functionals.
    Hüfner-Wulsdorf T; Klebe G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1409-1423. PubMed ID: 31922753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site.
    Brenk R; Vetter SW; Boyce SE; Goodin DB; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Apr; 357(5):1449-70. PubMed ID: 16490206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules.
    Lie MA; Thomsen R; Pedersen CN; Schiøtt B; Christensen MH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 21452852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site.
    Wei BQ; Weaver LH; Ferrari AM; Matthews BW; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 337(5):1161-82. PubMed ID: 15046985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Solvation thermodynamic mapping of molecular surfaces in AmberTools: GIST.
    Ramsey S; Nguyen C; Salomon-Ferrer R; Walker RC; Gilson MK; Kurtzman T
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Aug; 37(21):2029-37. PubMed ID: 27317094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.