168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28761274)
1. Comparative evaluation of bite force analytical study following mandibular osteosysthesis using three-dimensional and conventional locking miniplates.
Kinra PK; Jayakumar K; Soumithran CS; Michael MJ; Passi D; Singh M
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2017; 8(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 28761274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.
Gupta A; Singh V; Mohammad S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1903-8. PubMed ID: 22695018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis and internal locking miniplate osteosynthesis.
Kumar S; Gattumeedhi SR; Sankhla B; Garg A; Ingle E; Dagli N
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2014 Nov; 4(Suppl 1):S26-31. PubMed ID: 25452924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Bite Force in Mandible Fractures Treated with Three-Dimensional Curved Locking Strut Plate Versus Straight Locking Miniplate.
Virk SK; Gumber TK; Dhawan A; Bhullar RS; Kapila S
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):1006-1021. PubMed ID: 38105849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bite Force as a Parameter for Comparison Between Three-Dimensional and Standard Titanium Miniplates for the Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.
Jain MK; Kerur P
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2019 Jun; 18(2):249-255. PubMed ID: 30996547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study.
Gamit M; Patel Y; Sood R; Vadera H; Savjani K; Bhatti Z
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 37740128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is "Bite force" a reliable parameter to compare masticatory efficiency restoration following ORIF of anterior mandibular fractures?
Patel S; Bhimani K; Narsingyani R; Bhatti Z; Savani R
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(6):777-781. PubMed ID: 36159067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.
Giri KY; Sahu P; Rastogi S; Dandriyal R; Mall S; Singh AP; Indra B NP; Pratap Singh H
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Dec; 14(4):972-8. PubMed ID: 26604472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Locking Miniplate Osteosynthesis of Anterior Mandibular Fractures-Quo Vadis?
Desai V; Jain MK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1041.e1-1041.e9. PubMed ID: 30796907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of condylar position in anterior mandibular fractures using 3 dimensional miniplate osteosynthesis versus conventional miniplates: Randomized clinical trial.
Mohammad OA; Ashour EM; Hassanein FAA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 34756733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3D and Standard Miniplates in Treatment of Mandibular Symphysis and Parasymphysis Fractures.
Agarwal M; Meena B; Gupta DK; Tiwari AD; Jakhar SK
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Jun; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 24821994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of 3d Locking Versus Non-Locking Titanium Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fracture.
Khan M; Vishal ; Kumar A; Khaitan T; Sinha DK; Kumar C
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Sep; 72(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 32714854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study on evaluation of role of 1.5 mm microplates and 2.0 mm standard miniplates in management of mandibular fractures using bite force as indicator of recommendation.
Ahmed SS; Rehman SA; Ansari MK; Khan AA; Farooq O; Khan AH
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2016; 7(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 28163477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of Le Fort I maxillary fracture plating techniques.
Wang H; Chen MS; Fan YB; Tang W; Tian WD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 65(6):1109-16. PubMed ID: 17517293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of biting force when using a combination of one microplate and one miniplate versus two miniplates for fixation of parasymphyseal mandibular fracture: the use of microplates for parasymphyseal mandibular fracture.
Zaky MM; Fayed NA; Shehab MF
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 24(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 31713697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture.
Rastogi S; Reddy MP; Swarup AG; Swarup D; Choudhury R
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2016 Mar; 9(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 26889350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Titanium Versus 2-Dimensional Titanium Miniplates for Open Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphysis Fracture.
Mittal Y; Varghese KG; Mohan S; Jayakumar N; Chhag S
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Mar; 15(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 26929559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bite force measurement in mandibular parasymphyseal fractures: a preliminary clinical study.
Kshirsagar R; Jaggi N; Halli R
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2011 Dec; 4(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 23205177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular Osteosynthesis: A Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Fixation Systems Using 2.0 mm Titanium Miniplates & 3-D Locking Plates.
Goyal M; Marya K; Chawla S; Pandey R
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2011 Dec; 10(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 23204747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
