168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28761274)
41. A Comparative Evaluation of 2.0mm Two-Dimensional Miniplates Versus 2.0mm Three-Dimensional Miniplates in Mandibular Fractures.
Sarepally G; Seethamsetty S; Karpe T; Nasyam FA; Fatima U; Fatema R
Cureus; 2022 Jan; 14(1):e21325. PubMed ID: 35186584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical stress in symphyseal fractured human mandible reduced with miniplates during mastication.
Wang H; Ji B; Jiang W; Liu L; Zhang P; Tang W; Tian W; Fan Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1585-92. PubMed ID: 20434254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study.
Aggarwal S; Singh M; Modi P; Walia E; Aggarwal R
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 28785906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A Comparative Assessment of the Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures Using 3D Plates and 2D Miniplates.
Singh R; Singh R; Jayam C; Nazeer J; Iqubal MA; Singh S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):400-403. PubMed ID: 32584276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative Evaluation between Single Noncompression Miniplate and Two Noncompression Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures.
Mondal S; Singh G; Mishra M; Gaur A; Srivastava A
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2019 Jun; 12(2):122-127. PubMed ID: 31073361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Management of mandibular interforaminal fractures using 3 dimensional locking and standard titanium miniplates - a comparative preliminary report of 10 cases.
Jain MK; Sankar K; Ramesh C; Bhatta R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e475-8. PubMed ID: 22487270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of Bite Force After Treatment of Le Fort Fractures by Internal Fixation and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation.
Ngoc DV; Phuc LH; Tien CH; Tuan NV; Chanh LT; Phuong LH; Duc NM
Med Arch; 2021 Oct; 75(5):371-374. PubMed ID: 35169360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparative evaluation of a single 2.0-mm AO locking reconstruction plate with conventional miniplate osteosynthesis for treatment of linear non-comminuted fractures of symphysis and parasymphsis region of the mandible.
Hu W; Agrawal M; Thadani S; Mukul SK; Sood R; Patel A; Dhanak R; Tailor S
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 120(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 30739640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effectiveness of 2.0 mm Standard and 2.0 mm Locking Miniplates in Management of Mandibular Fractures: A Clinical Comparative Study.
Shaik M; Subba Raju T; Rao NK; Reddy CK
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Mar; 13(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24644396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wusiman P; Taxifulati D; Weidong L; Moming A
J Dent Sci; 2019 Mar; 14(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 30988882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The biomechanical stability of miniplate osteosynthesis configurations in bilateral mandibular angle fractures.
Ay N; Yildirimturk Dogan S; Sirin Y
J Oral Sci; 2023 Oct; 65(4):265-269. PubMed ID: 37648469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficacy of 3-Dimensional plates over Champys miniplates in mandibular anterior fractures.
Barde DH; Mudhol A; Ali FM; Madan RS; Kar S; Ustaad F
J Int Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 6(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24653598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. EXPERIENCE WITH miniplate osteosynthesis in THE MANAGEMENT OF mandibular fractures IN NORTHWEST NIGERIA.
Akhiwu BI; Efunkoya AA; Omeje KU; Amole IO; Osunde DO; Isa L
J West Afr Coll Surg; 2015; 5(2):66-83. PubMed ID: 27830123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of Bite Force with Locking Plates versus Non-Locking Plates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.
Glória JCR; Fernandes IA; Silveira EMD; Souza GM; Rocha RL; Galvão EL; Falci SGM
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 22(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 29619110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Which fixation methods are better between three-dimensional anatomical plate and two miniplates for the mandibular subcondylar fracture open treatment?
Sukegawa S; Kanno T; Masui M; Sukegawa-Takahashi Y; Kishimoto T; Sato A; Furuki Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 47(5):771-777. PubMed ID: 30770259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. In vitro comparison of commercial and ultrafine-grained titanium osteosynthesis miniplates used on mandibular fractures.
Asl HG; Alsaran A
Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 33448160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A new biomechanical model for evaluation of fixation systems of maxillofacial fractures.
Ji B; Wang C; Song F; Chen M; Wang H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 40(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 21865052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparative analysis of osteosynthesis of mandibular anterior fractures following open reduction using 'stainless steel lag screws and mini plates'.
Bhatnagar A; Bansal V; Kumar S; Mowar A
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Jun; 12(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 24431830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A randomized controlled trial to compare functional, combined rigid and functional and rigid fixation in double mandibular fractures.
Pandey S; Yadav P; Roychoudhury A; Bhutia O; Goswami D
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(2):233-237. PubMed ID: 35284226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
