174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2876144)
1. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?
Soutter WP; Wisdom S; Brough AK; Monaghan JM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Jan; 93(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 3942709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?
Kitchener HC; Burnett RA; Wilson ES; Cordiner JW
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1313-5. PubMed ID: 3109632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of outcome in women with borderline glandular change on cervical cytology.
Jadoon BA; Kehoe S; Romain K; Clelland C; Sundar SS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 19740591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical screening: management of patients referred for colposcopy with smear abnormalities less severe than dyskaryosis.
Usman F; Hammond R
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 9577736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears.
Giles JA; Deery A; Crow J; Walker P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1067-70. PubMed ID: 2804009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smear.
Maggi R; Zannoni E; Giorda G; Biraghi P; Sideri M
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Dec; 35(3):294-6. PubMed ID: 2599462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria?
Anderson DJ; Flannelly GM; Kitchener HC; Fisher PM; Mann EM; Campbell MK; Templeton A
BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6845):84-7. PubMed ID: 1638252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective study of colposcopy in women with mild dyskaryosis or koilocytosis.
Bolger BS; Lewis BV
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Nov; 95(11):1117-9. PubMed ID: 3207640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective analysis of 94 patients with CIN and false negative cervical smears taken at colposcopy.
Beeby AR; Wadehra V; Keating PJ; Wagstaff TI
Cytopathology; 1993; 4(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 8110972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Atypical cervix uteri smears--consequences?].
Nielsen MN; Hølund B; Nielsen B; Ejersbo D; Holm K
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May; 158(21):2985-6. PubMed ID: 8686036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Koilocytotic atypia and underlying dysplasia.
Shepherd J; Lynch W
J Fam Pract; 1991 Aug; 33(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 1890397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
