These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28762537)

  • 1. Affordability of Fertility Treatments and Multiple Births in the United States.
    Kulkarni AD; Adashi EY; Jamieson DJ; Crawford SB; Sunderam S; Kissin DM
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 31(5):438-448. PubMed ID: 28762537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2017 Feb; 66(6):1-24. PubMed ID: 28182605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States.
    Kulkarni AD; Jamieson DJ; Jones HW; Kissin DM; Gallo MF; Macaluso M; Adashi EY
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Dec; 369(23):2218-25. PubMed ID: 24304051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infertility insurance mandates and multiple births.
    Buckles KS
    Health Econ; 2013 Jul; 22(7):775-89. PubMed ID: 22692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of the contribution of assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatments to multiple births during the past 30 years in Japan: 1979-2008.
    Ooki S
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2011 Oct; 14(5):476-83. PubMed ID: 21962142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of the contribution of assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatments to multiple births during the past 30 years in Japan: 1979-2008.
    Ooki S
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2011 Dec; 14(6):476-83. PubMed ID: 22506318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decrease in American birth rates makes it imperative for the United States to implement state mandated fertility coverage.
    Tannus S; Dahan MH
    J Med Econ; 2019 Mar; 22(3):252-253. PubMed ID: 30550366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?
    Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Jeng G; Peterson HB
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jul; 80(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 12849794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal age and preterm births in singleton and twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilisation in the United States.
    Xiong X; Dickey RP; Pridjian G; Buekens P
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.
    Luke B; Brown MB; Wantman E; Seifer DB; Sparks AT; Lin PC; Doody KJ; Van Voorhis BJ; Spector LG
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):121-138. PubMed ID: 30328574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
    Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.