These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28762671)

  • 1. Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins.
    Moda MD; Godas AGL; Fernandes JC; Suzuki TYU; Guedes APA; Briso ALF; Bedran-Russo AK; Dos Santos PH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 28762671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of four resin composites subjected to thermocycling aging.
    Elmarsafy SM; Abdelwahab SA; Hussein F
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():35. PubMed ID: 37180693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of thermocycling on roughness of nanofill, microfill and microhybrid composites.
    Dos Santos PH; Catelan A; Albuquerque Guedes AP; Umeda Suzuki TY; de Lima Godas AG; Fraga Briso AL; Bedran-Russo AK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Apr; 73(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 25356634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system.
    da Costa JB; Goncalves F; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21702670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
    Borges AB; Marsilio AL; Pagani C; Rodrigues JR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):42-7; discussion 48. PubMed ID: 15259542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanistic aspects of fatigue crack growth behavior in resin based dental restorative composites.
    Shah MB; Ferracane JL; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):909-16. PubMed ID: 19233460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.
    Lu H; Roeder LB; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(5):297-303; discussion 304. PubMed ID: 14620660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins.
    Barbosa SH; Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Nunes OB
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16113932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable restorative materials.
    Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N; Karabulut E
    Dent Mater J; 2008 Nov; 27(6):755-64. PubMed ID: 19241682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cigarette smoke on color stability and surface roughness of dental composites.
    Alandia-Roman CC; Cruvinel DR; Sousa AB; Pires-de-Souza FC; Panzeri H
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e73-9. PubMed ID: 23270748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.
    Başeren M
    J Biomater Appl; 2004 Oct; 19(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15381785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.