BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28763289)

  • 1. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
    Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
    Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
    Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Earplugs in Preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in an Auto Parts Factory in China.
    Gong W; Zhao L; Li L; Morata TC; Qiu W; Feng HA; Zhu B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34281127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How hearing conservation training format impacts personal attenuation ratings in U.S. Marine Corps Training Recruits.
    Federman J; Karch SJ; Duhon C
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 32924674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verifying earplug attenuation and evaluating the effectiveness of one-on-one training along with earplug fit testing at nine facilities in China.
    Gong W; Zhang J; Liu X; Ding E; Zhu B
    Am J Ind Med; 2021 Sep; 64(9):771-780. PubMed ID: 34250617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal attenuation ratings versus derated noise reduction ratings for hearing protection devices.
    Murphy WJ; Gong W; Karch SJ; Federman J; Schulz TY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1074. PubMed ID: 36050158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals.
    Toivonen M; Pääkkönen R; Savolainen S; Lehtomäki K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2002 Aug; 46(6):527-30. PubMed ID: 12176767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs.
    Samelli AG; Gomes RF; Chammas TV; Silva BG; Moreira RR; Fiorini AC
    Noise Health; 2018; 20(94):112-119. PubMed ID: 29785976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
    Park MY; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
    Schulz TY
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.