These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2876333)
1. Research on healthy volunteers. Lancet; 1986 Oct; 2(8512):900-1. PubMed ID: 2876333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics of volunteer research: the role of new EC guidelines. Haynes WG; Webb DJ Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Dec; 32(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 1768558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects. Owens JF Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research on healthy volunteers--a report of the Royal College of Physicians. Harry JD Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1987 Apr; 23(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 3580250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimentation on humans in biomedical research: implications for the industry of recent legislation and cases. Standridge LW Women Lawyers J; 1977; 63(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 11663032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. American IRBs and Dutch research ethics committees: how they compare. Bergkamp L IRB; 1988; 10(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. European guidance on medical research. Council of Europe. Committee of Ministers Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Mar; No. 56():8-10. PubMed ID: 11650345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH. Reynolds PD Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board. Levine C; Caplan AL IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protection of persons undergoing biomedical research: Code of Public Health; Book IIA. France Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Mar; No. 66():8-11. PubMed ID: 11651087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum. Wilson JP Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. All is not well in research on human subjects. Goldman J N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection. Childress JF J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NZ medicine after Cartwright. Gillett G BMJ; 1990 Apr; 300(6729):892-4. PubMed ID: 11642768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Advice on compensation: one IRB's response to DHEW's 'interim final regulation'. Levine RJ IRB; 1979 Mar; 1(1):5. PubMed ID: 11662737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent? Geller JL; Lidz CW; Pattulo EL IRB; 1987; 9(5):4-8. PubMed ID: 11649898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulatory aspects of the distinction between research and medical practice. McCarthy CR IRB; 1984; 6(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]