These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28763808)

  • 21. Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center.
    Tsiamoulos ZP; Misra R; Rameshshanker R; Elliott TR; Beintaris I; Thomas-Gibson S; Haycock A; Suzuki N; Rees C; Saunders BP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan; 87(1):280-287. PubMed ID: 28412271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study.
    Sola-Vera J; Catalá L; Uceda F; Picó MD; Pérez Rabasco E; Sáez J; Jiménez N; Arjona MD; Fernández M; Girona E; García-Sepulcre MF
    Endoscopy; 2019 Aug; 51(8):742-749. PubMed ID: 31096275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endocuff-assisted versus Cap-assisted Colonoscopy in Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate. A Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Buccino VR; Sacco R
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2020 Sep; 29(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 32830810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate: a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists.
    Pioche M; Matsumoto M; Takamaru H; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Matsuda T; Abe S; Kakugawa Y; Otake Y; Saito Y
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jan; 30(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 25861907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study.
    Sherif Naguib M; Khairy A; Shehab H; Abosheaishaa H; Meguid Kassem A
    Arab J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 25(2):102-108. PubMed ID: 38418285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Miss Rate of Colorectal Neoplasia.
    Wallace MB; Sharma P; Bhandari P; East J; Antonelli G; Lorenzetti R; Vieth M; Speranza I; Spadaccini M; Desai M; Lukens FJ; Babameto G; Batista D; Singh D; Palmer W; Ramirez F; Palmer R; Lunsford T; Ruff K; Bird-Liebermann E; Ciofoaia V; Arndtz S; Cangemi D; Puddick K; Derfus G; Johal AS; Barawi M; Longo L; Moro L; Repici A; Hassan C
    Gastroenterology; 2022 Jul; 163(1):295-304.e5. PubMed ID: 35304117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of 2 distal attachment mucosal exposure devices: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Rex DK; Sagi SV; Kessler WR; Rogers NA; Fischer M; Bohm ME; Dewitt JM; Lahr RE; Searight MP; Sullivan AW; McWhinney CD; Garcia JR; Broadley HM; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Nov; 90(5):835-840.e1. PubMed ID: 31319060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.
    Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy.
    Imaeda H; Yamaoka M; Ohgo H; Soma H; Ashitani K; Miyaguchi K; Tsuzuki Y; Hosoe N; Nakamoto H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1492-1496. PubMed ID: 31254485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    van Doorn SC; van der Vlugt M; Depla A; Wientjes CA; Mallant-Hent RC; Siersema PD; Tytgat K; Tuynman H; Kuiken SD; Houben G; Stokkers P; Moons L; Bossuyt P; Fockens P; Mundt MW; Dekker E
    Gut; 2017 Mar; 66(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 26674360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.
    Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Zhao S; Wang S; Pan P; Xia T; Chang X; Yang X; Guo L; Meng Q; Yang F; Qian W; Xu Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Gu L; Wang R; Jia F; Yao J; Li Z; Bai Y
    Gastroenterology; 2019 May; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. PubMed ID: 30738046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Floer M; Tschaikowski L; Schepke M; Kempinski R; Neubauer K; Poniewierka E; Kunsch S; Ameis D; Heinzow HS; Auer A; Schmidt HH; Ellenrieder V; Meister T
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2021 May; 9(4):443-450. PubMed ID: 33349200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO
    Anderson JC; Kahi CJ; Sullivan A; MacPhail M; Garcia J; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):591-598. PubMed ID: 30367879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
    Stoffel EM; Turgeon DK; Stockwell DH; Zhao L; Normolle DP; Tuck MK; Bresalier RS; Marcon NE; Baron JA; Ruffin MT; Brenner DE; Syngal S;
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2008 Nov; 1(6):470-5. PubMed ID: 19138994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved detection of right colon adenomas with additional retroflexion following two forward-view examinations: a prospective study.
    Lee HS; Jeon SW; Park HY; Yeo SJ
    Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):334-341. PubMed ID: 27931050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-assisted detection versus conventional colonoscopy for proximal colonic lesions: a multicenter, randomized, tandem-colonoscopy study.
    Lui TKL; Hang DV; Tsao SKK; Hui CKY; Mak LLY; Ko MKL; Cheung KS; Thian MY; Liang R; Tsui VWM; Yeung CK; Dao LV; Leung WK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Feb; 97(2):325-334.e1. PubMed ID: 36208795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Desai M; Sanchez-Yague A; Choudhary A; Pervez A; Gupta N; Vennalaganti P; Vennelaganti S; Fugazza A; Repici A; Hassan C; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):274-281.e3. PubMed ID: 28365356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
    Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of linked color imaging on the proximal adenoma miss rate: a multicenter tandem randomized controlled trial (the COCORICO trial).
    Karsenti D; Perrod G; Perrot B; Quénéhervé L; Chabrun E; Koch S; Vanbiervliet G; Rahmi G; Velut G; Moreno-Garcia M; Cavicchi M; Dray X
    Endoscopy; 2024 Oct; 56(10):759-767. PubMed ID: 38740373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.