These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28764422)

  • 1. A sliding two-alternative forced-choice paradigm for pitch discrimination.
    Arzounian D; de Kerangal M; de Cheveigné A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):167. PubMed ID: 28764422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural processing in a three-choice reaction-time task: a study using cerebral evoked-potentials and single-trial analysis in normal humans.
    Ortiz TA; Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 69(5):1499-512. PubMed ID: 8509828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a novel tool for assessing pitch discrimination.
    Ichimiya I; Ichimiya H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2016 Feb; 43(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 26277374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A user-operated audiometry method based on the maximum likelihood principle and the two-alternative forced-choice paradigm.
    Schmidt JH; Brandt C; Pedersen ER; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Andersen T; Poulsen T; Bælum J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):383-91. PubMed ID: 24512274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The greater temporal acuity in the reminder task than in the 2AFC task is independent of standard duration and sensory modality.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 21910520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of psychophysical procedures for level-discrimination thresholds.
    Marvit P; Florentine M; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3348-61. PubMed ID: 12822806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency resolution and discrimination of constant and dynamic tones in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Wood EJ; Fernandes M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1190-9. PubMed ID: 6643841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shape discrimination in age-related macular degeneration.
    Wang YZ; Wilson E; Locke KG; Edwards AO
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 43(6):2055-62. PubMed ID: 12037018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 May; 77(5):1861-7. PubMed ID: 3998296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.
    Ulrich R; Vorberg D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1219-27. PubMed ID: 19633337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2163-77. PubMed ID: 2348021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of frequency changes in transposed sequences of tones.
    Kidd GR; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):553-66. PubMed ID: 8568043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluations of reward dimensions in honey bees: evidence from two-alternative forced choice proboscis-extension conditioning.
    Shafir S; Yehonatan L
    Anim Cogn; 2014 May; 17(3):633-44. PubMed ID: 24121898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Organization of sensory discrimination and response selection in choice and nonchoice conditions: a study using cerebral evoked potentials in normal humans.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Shefrin SL
    J Neurophysiol; 1990 Oct; 64(4):1270-81. PubMed ID: 2258747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new two-alternative forced choice method for the unbiased characterization of perceptual bias and discriminability.
    Jogan M; Stocker AA
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):20. PubMed ID: 24627460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Source analysis of event-related potentials during pitch discrimination and pitch memory tasks.
    Talja S; Alho K; Rinne T
    Brain Topogr; 2015 May; 28(3):445-58. PubMed ID: 24043402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
    Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.