622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28764555)
1. Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.
Yin J; Paoletti X; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 28764555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Yin J; Qin R; Ezzalfani M; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 27633877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
Du Y; Yin J; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):271-286. PubMed ID: 30403559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose-finding design using mixed-effect proportional odds model for longitudinal graded toxicity data in phase I oncology clinical trials.
Doussau A; Thiébaut R; Paoletti X
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5430-47. PubMed ID: 24018535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards using a full spectrum of early clinical trial data: a retrospective analysis to compare potential longitudinal categorical models for molecular targeted therapies in oncology.
Colin P; Micallef S; Delattre M; Mancini P; Parent E
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2999-3016. PubMed ID: 26059319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose finding with longitudinal data: simpler models, richer outcomes.
Paoletti X; Doussau A; Ezzalfani M; Rizzo E; Thiébaut R
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2983-98. PubMed ID: 26109523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose-finding designs using a novel quasi-continuous endpoint for multiple toxicities.
Ezzalfani M; Zohar S; Qin R; Mandrekar SJ; Deley MC
Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2728-46. PubMed ID: 23335156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose-finding designs for trials of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies.
Chiuzan C; Shtaynberger J; Manji GA; Duong JK; Schwartz GK; Ivanova A; Lee SM
J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(3):477-494. PubMed ID: 28166468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.
Wang Y; Ivanova A
Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.
Riviere MK; Yuan Y; Jourdan JH; Dubois F; Zohar S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):466-479. PubMed ID: 26988926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Chen Z; Tighiouart M; Kowalski J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 22561391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian interval-based oncology dose-finding design with repeated quasi-continuous toxicity model.
Zhao D; Zhu J; Wang L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Mar; 102():106265. PubMed ID: 33418097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.
Wages NA; Tait C
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):903-20. PubMed ID: 24904956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
Guo B; Li Y
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.
Pan H; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):266-279. PubMed ID: 26991076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
Lin R; Yin G
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium.
Bautista F; Moreno L; Marshall L; Pearson ADJ; Geoerger B; Paoletti X
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Nov; 86():275-284. PubMed ID: 29055843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive Phase I clinical trial design using Markov models for conditional probability of toxicity.
Fernandes LL; Taylor JM; Murray S
J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(3):475-98. PubMed ID: 26098782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
