These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28764579)

  • 1. Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
    Barda G; Ganer Herman H; Sagiv R; Bar J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Oct; 31(20):2777-2781. PubMed ID: 28764579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
    Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Term prelabor rupture of membranes: Foley catheter versus dinoprostone as ripening agent.
    Athiel Y; Crequit S; Bongiorno M; Sanyan S; Renevier B
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 49(8):101834. PubMed ID: 32585393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Bar J; Kovo M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 294(4):725-30. PubMed ID: 26837386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
    Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of vaginal washing before intravaginal dinoprostone insertion for labor induction: A randomized clinical trial.
    Yayla Abide Ç; Kurek Eken M; Ozkaya E; Yenidede I; Bostanci Ergen E; Kilicci C; Sanverdi I; Eroğlu M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2149-2155. PubMed ID: 30094885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
    Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
    Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial.
    Eser A; Ozkaya E; Abide CY; Eser T; Eser GY; Abike F; Tayyar AT; Eroglu M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 30536117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.
    Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Arthuis C; Winer N; Parant O; Poncelet C; Chauleur C; Hannigsberg J; Ducarme G; Gallot D; Gabriel R; Desbriere R; Beucher G; Faraguet C; Isly H; Rozenberg P; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F;
    PLoS Med; 2021 Feb; 18(2):e1003448. PubMed ID: 33571294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis.
    Wang H; Hong S; Liu Y; Duan Y; Yin H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2382-8. PubMed ID: 26427519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
    Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT-N).
    Connolly KA; Kohari KS; Rekawek P; Smilen BS; Miller MR; Moshier E; Factor SH; Stone JL; Bianco AT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27018464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.