140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28764619)
1. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success.
Chambers GM; Paul RC; Harris K; Fitzgerald O; Boothroyd CV; Rombauts L; Chapman MG; Jorm L
Med J Aust; 2017 Aug; 207(3):114-118. PubMed ID: 28764619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The number of oocytes associated with maximum cumulative live birth rates per aspiration depends on female age: a population study of 221 221 treatment cycles.
Law YJ; Zhang N; Venetis CA; Chambers GM; Harris K
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1778-1787. PubMed ID: 31398253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries?
De Neubourg D; Bogaerts K; Blockeel C; Coetsier T; Delvigne A; Devreker F; Dubois M; Gillain N; Gordts S; Wyns C
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 26537922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child.
Paul RC; Fitzgerald O; Lieberman D; Venetis C; Chambers GM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 32380547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cumulative live birth rates and number of oocytes retrieved in women of advanced age. A single centre analysis including 4500 women ≥38 years old.
Devesa M; Tur R; Rodríguez I; Coroleu B; Martínez F; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2010-2017. PubMed ID: 30272168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cumulative live birth rates in more than 3,000 patients with poor ovarian response: a 15-year survey of final in vitro fertilization outcome.
Xu B; Chen Y; Geerts D; Yue J; Li Z; Zhu G; Jin L
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jun; 109(6):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29935642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population trends and live birth rates associated with common ART treatment strategies.
Chambers GM; Wand H; Macaldowie A; Chapman MG; Farquhar CM; Bowman M; Molloy D; Ledger W
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2632-2641. PubMed ID: 27664207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Live-Birth Rate Associated With Repeat In Vitro Fertilization Treatment Cycles.
Smith ADAC; Tilling K; Nelson SM; Lawlor DA
JAMA; 2015 Dec 22-29; 314(24):2654-2662. PubMed ID: 26717030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Final ART success rates: a 10 years survey.
Gnoth C; Maxrath B; Skonieczny T; Friol K; Godehardt E; Tigges J
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2239-46. PubMed ID: 21659314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cumulative live birth rates for low-prognosis women over 5 years or 9 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Chen D; Shen X; Wang L; Kuang Y
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Mar; 22(1):233. PubMed ID: 35317752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the Likelihood of Live Birth in Assisted Reproductive Technology According to the Number of Oocytes Retrieved and Female Age Using a Generalized Additive Model: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 17,948 Cycles.
Zhu H; Zhao C; Xiao P; Zhang S
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():606231. PubMed ID: 33995268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cumulative live birth rates over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation cycles: 10-year cohort study of 20,687 women following freeze-all strategy from one single centre.
Wang N; Yin X; Tao Y; Wang Y; Zhu Q
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jan; 305(1):251-259. PubMed ID: 34350510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Birthweight percentiles by gestational age for births following assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2010.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1787-800. PubMed ID: 24908671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) cumulative live birth rates following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy (PGD-A) or morphological assessment of embryos: A cohort analysis.
Lee E; Chambers GM; Hale L; Illingworth P; Wilton L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Oct; 58(5):525-532. PubMed ID: 29280479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Low Prognosis Patients According to the POSEIDON Criteria: An Analysis of 26,697 Cycles of
Li Y; Li X; Yang X; Cai S; Lu G; Lin G; Humaidan P; Gong F
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2019; 10():642. PubMed ID: 31608011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the "freeze-all" policy allow for a better outcome in assisted reproductive techniques than the use of fresh embryo transfers? - A retrospective study on cumulative live birth rates.
Chang JC; Chen MJ; Guu HF; Chen YF; Yi YC; Kung HF; Chen LY; Chou MM
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):775-780. PubMed ID: 29241919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cumulative live birth rate of low prognosis patients with POSEIDON stratification: a single-centre data analysis.
Yang R; Zhang C; Chen L; Wang Y; Li R; Liu P; Qiao J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Nov; 41(5):834-844. PubMed ID: 32978073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cumulative live birth rates per oocytes retrieved cycle: evaluation of clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI].
Wu CX; Zhang T; Shu L; Huang J; Diao FY; Ding W; Gao Y; Wang W; Mao YD; Cui YG; Liu JY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):160-166. PubMed ID: 29609229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of ectopic pregnancy lowest with transfer of single frozen blastocyst.
Li Z; Sullivan EA; Chapman M; Farquhar C; Wang YA
Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2048-54. PubMed ID: 26202917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
