These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
714 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28764707)
1. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review. Iwamoto M; Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):143. PubMed ID: 28764707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection. Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Intersphincteric Resection Without a Protective Defunctioning Stoma for Lower Rectal Cancer. Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Hasebe T; Saito T; Hakamada K Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23 Suppl 2():S249-56. PubMed ID: 25743332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical features and risk factors of surgical complications after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy]. Qin QY; Ma TH; Cai J; Huang XY; Wu YL; Wang HM; Wang H; Wang L Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 56(12):892-899. PubMed ID: 30497115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers]. Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection without a diverting stoma: "pull-through/reborn". Hamamoto H; Okuda J; Yamamoto M; Masubuchi S; Ishii M; Osumi W; Tanaka K; Uchiyama K Asian J Endosc Surg; 2021 Apr; 14(2):314-317. PubMed ID: 32662098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic delayed coloanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for low rectal cancer surgery: 85 consecutive patients from a single institution. Sage PY; Trilling B; Waroquet PA; Voirin D; Girard E; Faucheron JL Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Jul; 22(7):511-518. PubMed ID: 30027493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach. Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Inada R; Takawa M; Moriya Y Dig Surg; 2011; 28(5-6):404-9. PubMed ID: 22189000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection. Yokota M; Ito M; Nishizawa Y; Kobayashi A; Saito N World J Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(8):2168-2177. PubMed ID: 28289834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis. Cong JC; Chen CS; Ma MX; Xia ZX; Liu DS; Zhang FY Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 16(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 24460588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer. Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer]. Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Feng Y; Zhu J; Ding J Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 20(4):432-438. PubMed ID: 28440525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis? Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score. Hain E; Manceau G; Maggiori L; Mongin C; Prost À la Denise J; Panis Y Surgery; 2017 Apr; 161(4):1028-1039. PubMed ID: 27894710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mitigating the Consequences of Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Resection: Is It Achievable by a Simple Method? Yang Q; Tang C; Qi X; Yi G; Xu L Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 24902687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of failed low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis. Sabbagh C; Maggiori L; Panis Y J Visc Surg; 2013 Jun; 150(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 23665058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer]. Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]