493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28764707)
1. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.
Iwamoto M; Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):143. PubMed ID: 28764707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Intersphincteric Resection Without a Protective Defunctioning Stoma for Lower Rectal Cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Hasebe T; Saito T; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23 Suppl 2():S249-56. PubMed ID: 25743332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical features and risk factors of surgical complications after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy].
Qin QY; Ma TH; Cai J; Huang XY; Wu YL; Wang HM; Wang H; Wang L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 56(12):892-899. PubMed ID: 30497115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic delayed coloanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for low rectal cancer surgery: 85 consecutive patients from a single institution.
Sage PY; Trilling B; Waroquet PA; Voirin D; Girard E; Faucheron JL
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Jul; 22(7):511-518. PubMed ID: 30027493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach.
Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Inada R; Takawa M; Moriya Y
Dig Surg; 2011; 28(5-6):404-9. PubMed ID: 22189000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection.
Yokota M; Ito M; Nishizawa Y; Kobayashi A; Saito N
World J Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(8):2168-2177. PubMed ID: 28289834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis.
Cong JC; Chen CS; Ma MX; Xia ZX; Liu DS; Zhang FY
Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 16(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 24460588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Feng Y; Zhu J; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 20(4):432-438. PubMed ID: 28440525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bowel dysfunction after anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic sphincter-saving operative intervention for rectal cancer: A case-matched study in 46 patients using the Low Anterior Resection Score.
Hain E; Manceau G; Maggiori L; Mongin C; Prost À la Denise J; Panis Y
Surgery; 2017 Apr; 161(4):1028-1039. PubMed ID: 27894710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mitigating the Consequences of Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Resection: Is It Achievable by a Simple Method?
Yang Q; Tang C; Qi X; Yi G; Xu L
Surg Innov; 2015 Aug; 22(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 24902687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of failed low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis.
Sabbagh C; Maggiori L; Panis Y
J Visc Surg; 2013 Jun; 150(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 23665058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection.
Ihnát P; Guňková P; Peteja M; Vávra P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4809-4816. PubMed ID: 26902615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
