These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28766978)

  • 21. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas.
    Pesce K; Tajerian M; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Boietti B; Frangella MJ; Benitez S
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
    Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.
    Gemici AA; Arıbal E; Özaydın AN; Gürdal SÖ; Özçınar B; Cabioğlu N; Özmen V
    Eur J Breast Health; 2020 Apr; 16(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 32285032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population: A retrospective observational study.
    Rahmat K; Ab Mumin N; Ramli Hamid MT; Fadzli F; Ng WL; Muhammad Gowdh NF
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(39):e22405. PubMed ID: 32991467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Persistent inter-observer variability of breast density assessment using BI-RADS® 5th edition guidelines.
    Portnow LH; Georgian-Smith D; Haider I; Barrios M; Bay CP; Nelson KP; Raza S
    Clin Imaging; 2022 Mar; 83():21-27. PubMed ID: 34952487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one.
    Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Tosto S; Chiesa F; Martinoli C; Derchi LE; Calabrese M
    Breast; 2009 Feb; 18(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19010678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment.
    Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Woitek R; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Baltzer PA; Vogl WD; Weber M; Meyer-Baese A; Pinker K
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3917-3922. PubMed ID: 27108300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
    Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
    Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density Distribution.
    Irshad A; Leddy R; Ackerman S; Cluver A; Pavic D; Abid A; Lewis MC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):1366-1371. PubMed ID: 27656766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment.
    Holland K; van Zelst J; den Heeten GJ; Imhof-Tas M; Mann RM; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
    Breast; 2016 Oct; 29():49-54. PubMed ID: 27420382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement.
    Rawashdeh M; Lewis S; Zaitoun M; Brennan P
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():294-298. PubMed ID: 29673997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of breast density assessments according to BI-RADS 4th and 5th editions and experience level.
    Gemici AA; Bayram E; Hocaoglu E; Inci E
    Acta Radiol Open; 2020 Jul; 9(7):2058460120937381. PubMed ID: 32733694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.
    Damases CN; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26514436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in Breast Density Reporting Patterns of Radiologists After Publication of the 5th Edition BI-RADS Guidelines: A Single Institution Experience.
    Irshad A; Leddy R; Lewis M; Cluver A; Ackerman S; Pavic D; Collins H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):943-948. PubMed ID: 28796548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.
    Damases CN; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 27059785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.