These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28767683)

  • 21. Trunk position modulates anterior cruciate ligament forces and strains during a single-leg squat.
    Kulas AS; Hortobágyi T; DeVita P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21839557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Utility of the frontal plane projection angle in females with patellofemoral pain.
    Willson JD; Davis IS
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2008 Oct; 38(10):606-15. PubMed ID: 18827327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Review of the Biomechanical Differences Between the High-Bar and Low-Bar Back-Squat.
    Glassbrook DJ; Helms ER; Brown SR; Storey AG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Sep; 31(9):2618-2634. PubMed ID: 28570490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lower extremity biomechanics during a regular and counterbalanced squat.
    Lynn SK; Noffal GJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Sep; 26(9):2417-25. PubMed ID: 22076098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability and Agreement of 3D Trunk and Lower Extremity Movement Analysis by Means of Inertial Sensor Technology for Unipodal and Bipodal Tasks.
    van der Straaten R; Bruijnes AKBD; Vanwanseele B; Jonkers I; De Baets L; Timmermans A
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 30609808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lower extremity kinematics of a single-leg squat with an orthotic in male and female collegiate athletes.
    Joseph MF; Holsing KL; Tiberio D
    J Appl Biomech; 2014 Jun; 30(3):361-5. PubMed ID: 24347562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Altering Knee Position and Squat Depth on VMO : VL EMG Ratio During Squat Exercises.
    Jaberzadeh S; Yeo D; Zoghi M
    Physiother Res Int; 2016 Sep; 21(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 25962352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Kinematic Comparison of Aquatic- and Land-Based Stationary Exercises in Overweight and Normal Weight Children.
    Yaghoubi M; Fink PW; Page WH; Heydari A; Shultz SP
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2019 Aug; 31(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 30596335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single-Leg Squat Performance is Impaired 1 to 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy.
    Charlton PC; Bryant AL; Kemp JL; Clark RA; Crossley KM; Collins NJ
    PM R; 2016 Apr; 8(4):321-330. PubMed ID: 26226209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of movement speed on kinematic variability and dynamic stability of the trunk in healthy individuals and low back pain patients.
    Asgari M; Sanjari MA; Mokhtarinia HR; Moeini Sedeh S; Khalaf K; Parnianpour M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Aug; 30(7):682-8. PubMed ID: 26021879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical Comparison of Countermovement Jumps Performed on Land and in Water: Age Effects.
    Louder T; Dolny D; Bressel E
    J Sport Rehabil; 2018 May; 27(3):249-256. PubMed ID: 28513324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A biomechanical investigation of a single-limb squat: implications for lower extremity rehabilitation exercise.
    Richards J; Thewlis D; Selfe J; Cunningham A; Hayes C
    J Athl Train; 2008; 43(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18833310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gait Kinematic Analysis in Water Using Wearable Inertial Magnetic Sensors.
    Fantozzi S; Giovanardi A; Borra D; Gatta G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138105. PubMed ID: 26368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Kinematic and neuromuscular relationships between lower extremity clinical movement assessments.
    Mauntel TC; Cram TR; Frank BS; Begalle RL; Norcross MF; Blackburn JT; Padua DA
    Sports Biomech; 2018 Jun; 17(2):273-284. PubMed ID: 28805506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technology in Rehabilitation: Comparing Personalised and Global Classification Methodologies in Evaluating the Squat Exercise with Wearable IMUs.
    Whelan DF; O'Reilly MA; Ward TE; Delahunt E; Caulfield B
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 Oct; 56(5):361-369. PubMed ID: 28612890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of different footwear on 3-D kinematics and muscle activation during the barbell back squat in males.
    Sinclair J; McCarthy D; Bentley I; Hurst HT; Atkins S
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2015; 15(7):583-90. PubMed ID: 25331484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of acute countermovement jump responses after functional isometric and dynamic half squats.
    Boyd DA; Donald N; Balshaw TG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3363-74. PubMed ID: 24918298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of two different arm positions and weight status on select kinematic variables during the bodyweight squat.
    Glave AP; Olson JM; Applegate DK; Brezzo RD
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Nov; 26(11):3148-54. PubMed ID: 22158095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of thigh and shank marker quantity on lower extremity kinematics using a constrained model.
    Slater AA; Hullfish TJ; Baxter JR
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Nov; 19(1):399. PubMed ID: 30424811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of sex and fatigue on single leg squat kinematics in healthy young adults.
    Weeks BK; Carty CP; Horan SA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Sep; 16():271. PubMed ID: 26423154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.