200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28768227)
1. Variation in the provision and practice of implant-based breast reconstruction in the UK: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire.
Mylvaganam S; Conroy E; Williamson PR; Barnes NLP; Cutress RI; Gardiner MD; Jain A; Skillman JM; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Blazeby JM; Potter S; Holcombe C; ;
Breast; 2017 Oct; 35():182-190. PubMed ID: 28768227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adherence to best practice consensus guidelines for implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire survey.
Mylvaganam S; Conroy EJ; Williamson PR; Barnes NLP; Cutress RI; Gardiner MD; Jain A; Skillman JM; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Blazeby JM; Potter S; Holcombe C; ;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 44(5):708-716. PubMed ID: 29472041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction.
Potter S; Conroy EJ; Williamson PR; Thrush S; Whisker LJ; Skillman JM; Barnes NL; Cutress RI; Teasdale EM; Mills N; Mylvaganam S; Branford OA; McEvoy K; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C;
Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2016; 2():41. PubMed ID: 27965859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current practice and barriers of mesh-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction in China: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of 110 hospitals.
Guo R; Li L; Su Y; Xiu B; Zhang Q; Wang J; Chi W; Yang B; Zhang Y; Cao A; Shao Z; Wu J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 31519428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Current practice of implant-based breast reconstruction: results from China national practice questionnaire survey].
Guo R; Xiu BQ; Su YH; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chi WR; Li L; Yang BL; Zhang YY; Cao AY; Shao ZM; Wu J
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 57(8):616-621. PubMed ID: 31422632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.
Potter S; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Williamson PR; Whisker L; Thrush S; Skillman J; Barnes NLP; Mylvaganam S; Teasdale E; Jain A; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Holcombe C; ;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):254-266. PubMed ID: 30639093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Radiotherapy on Patient-reported Outcomes of Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With and Without Mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Ann Surg; 2022 May; 275(5):992-1001. PubMed ID: 32657919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve? A qualitative study.
Davies G; Mills N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
Trials; 2020 Apr; 21(1):316. PubMed ID: 32252788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate surgical mesh-free implant-based breast reconstruction with fascial flap in breast cancer patients after mastectomy.
Chen AX; Chen X; Yu Y; Wang X; Zhang B; Cao XC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 36477273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision Incidence after Immediate Direct-to-Implant versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using National Real-World Data.
Becherer BE; Heeg E; Young-Afat DA; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Rakhorst HA; Mureau MAM;
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 36729987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Schrenk P; Bjelic-Radisic V; Unterrieder K; Leser C; Fink-Retter A; Salama M; Singer C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 42(5):665-71. PubMed ID: 26947961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The iBRA-2 (immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy audit) study: protocol for a prospective national multicentre cohort study to evaluate the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the delivery of adjuvant therapy.
Dave R; O'Connell R; Rattay T; Tolkien Z; Barnes N; Skillman J; Williamson P; Conroy E; Gardiner M; Harnett A; O'Brien C; Blazeby J; Potter S; Holcombe C;
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012678. PubMed ID: 27855106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
