These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28768256)

  • 1. Estimation of FST and the Impact of de novo Mutation.
    Shriner D; Chen G; Adeyemo A; Rotimi CN
    Hum Hered; 2016; 82(1-2):37-49. PubMed ID: 28768256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the unbiased estimator theta for population genetic survey data.
    Weicker JJ; Brumfield RT; Winker K
    Evolution; 2001 Dec; 55(12):2601-5. PubMed ID: 11831672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The empirical Bayes estimators of fine-scale population structure in high gene flow species.
    Kitada S; Nakamichi R; Kishino H
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1210-1222. PubMed ID: 28241394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Background selection and F
    Matthey-Doret R; Whitlock MC
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Sep; 28(17):3902-3914. PubMed ID: 31349365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Properties of Weir and Cockerham's Fst estimators and associated bootstrap confidence intervals.
    Leviyang S; Hamilton MB
    Theor Popul Biol; 2011; 79(1-2):39-52. PubMed ID: 21094655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF POPULATION DIVERGENCE TIMES AND POPULATION PHYLOGENY IN MODELS WITHOUT MUTATION.
    Nielsen R; Mountain JL; Huelsenbeck JP; Slatkin M
    Evolution; 1998 Jun; 52(3):669-677. PubMed ID: 28565245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Improved F(st) Estimator.
    Chen G; Yuan A; Shriner D; Tekola-Ayele F; Zhou J; Bentley AR; Zhou Y; Wang C; Newport MJ; Adeyemo A; Rotimi CN
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135368. PubMed ID: 26317214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex-specific genetic differentiation and coalescence times: estimating sex-biased dispersal rates.
    Vitalis R
    Mol Ecol; 2002 Jan; 11(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 11903910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of a common odds ratio under binary cluster sampling.
    Ahn C; Odom-Maryon T
    Stat Med; 1995 Jul; 14(14):1567-76. PubMed ID: 7481193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating and interpreting FST: the impact of rare variants.
    Bhatia G; Patterson N; Sankararaman S; Price AL
    Genome Res; 2013 Sep; 23(9):1514-21. PubMed ID: 23861382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Worldwide F(ST) estimates relative to five continental-scale populations.
    Steele CD; Court DS; Balding DJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2014 Nov; 78(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 26460400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extending the Lincoln-Petersen estimator for multiple identifications in one source.
    Köse T; Orman M; Ikiz F; Baksh MF; Gallagher J; Böhning D
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4237-49. PubMed ID: 24833434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A MULTISPECIES APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS OF GENE FLOW IN MARINE SHORE FISHES.
    Waples RS
    Evolution; 1987 Mar; 41(2):385-400. PubMed ID: 28568763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population differentiation through mutation and drift--a comparison of genetic identity measures.
    Tomiuk J; Guldbrandtsen B; Loeschcke V
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):545-58. PubMed ID: 9720297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variance estimation for systematic designs in spatial surveys.
    Fewster RM
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1518-31. PubMed ID: 21534940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating F-statistics.
    Weir BS; Hill WG
    Annu Rev Genet; 2002; 36():721-50. PubMed ID: 12359738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian estimates of linkage disequilibrium.
    Sebastiani P; Abad-Grau MM
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jun; 8():36. PubMed ID: 17592642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate bayesian computation.
    Tallmon DA; Luikart G; Beaumont MA
    Genetics; 2004 Jun; 167(2):977-88. PubMed ID: 15238546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias correction for segregation ratio estimation in human genetics.
    Yao YC; Tai JJ
    Biometrics; 2000 Sep; 56(3):795-800. PubMed ID: 10985218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.