These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28770382)

  • 21. Assessment of sex in a modern Turkish population using cranial anthropometric parameters.
    Ekizoglu O; Hocaoglu E; Inci E; Can IO; Solmaz D; Aksoy S; Buran CF; Sayin I
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Jul; 21():45-52. PubMed ID: 27497333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex determination from the talus in a contemporary Greek population using discriminant function analysis.
    Peckmann TR; Orr K; Meek S; Manolis SK
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Jul; 33():14-9. PubMed ID: 26048490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forensic sex estimation using the vertebrae: an evaluation on two European populations.
    Garoufi N; Bertsatos A; Chovalopoulou ME; Villa C
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):2307-2318. PubMed ID: 32940842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks.
    Steyn M; Işcan MY
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):86.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18554832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Influence of Body Size on the Expression of Sexually Dimorphic Morphological Traits.
    Horbaly HE; Kenyhercz MW; Hubbe M; Steadman DW
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 29975982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Osteometric sex estimation from the os coxa in a Thai population.
    Mahakkanukrauh P; Ruengdit S; Tun SM; Case DT; Sinthubua A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():127.e1-127.e7. PubMed ID: 28062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exocranial surfaces for sex assessment of the human cranium.
    Musilová B; Dupej J; Velemínská J; Chaumoitre K; Bruzek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Dec; 269():70-77. PubMed ID: 27883982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Investigation into the Relationship between Human Cranial and Pelvic Sexual Dimorphism.
    Best KC; Garvin HM; Cabo LL
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):990-1000. PubMed ID: 29044526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination.
    Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sex estimation: a comparison of techniques based on binary logistic, probit and cumulative probit regression, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, neural networks, and naïve Bayes classification using ordinal variables.
    Nikita E; Nikitas P
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 May; 134(3):1213-1225. PubMed ID: 31444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation and recalibration of sex estimation methods using pubic nonmetric traits for the Chilean population.
    Rojas González N; Obertová Z; Franklin D
    Int J Legal Med; 2024 Sep; 138(5):2071-2080. PubMed ID: 38613625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of the vault and midsagittal curve of the neurocranium in a modern Greek population sample.
    Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
    Homo; 2016 Jun; 67(3):173-87. PubMed ID: 27109917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexual dimorphism of the hip joint in Greeks.
    Papaloucas C; Fiska A; Demetriou T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):83.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18455335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Validation Study of the Langley et al. (2017) Decision Tree Model for Sex Estimation.
    Garvin HM; Klales AR
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 29148064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy and Reliability of the Klales et al. (2012) Morphoscopic Pelvic Sexing Method.
    Lesciotto KM; Doershuk LJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):214-220. PubMed ID: 28382657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample.
    Gapert R; Black S; Last J
    Int J Legal Med; 2009 Jan; 123(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 18553095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population.
    Franklin D; Cardini A; Flavel A; Marks MK
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 Sep; 128(5):861-72. PubMed ID: 24789357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sexual dimorphism of the metacarpals in contemporary Cretans: Are there differences with mainland Greeks?
    Nathena D; Gambaro L; Tzanakis N; Michalodimitrakis M; Kranioti EF
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():515.e1-515.e8. PubMed ID: 26462576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A method of sexing the human os coxae based on logistic regressions and Bruzek's nonmetric traits.
    Santos F; Guyomarc'h P; Rmoutilova R; Bruzek J
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Jul; 169(3):435-447. PubMed ID: 31093965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.