These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28771134)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Cobas u 701 microscopy analyser compared with urine culture in screening for urinary tract infection.
    Kim SH; Song SA; Urm SH; Kook JK; Kim HR; Yong D; Choi JY; Shin JH
    J Med Microbiol; 2017 Aug; 66(8):1110-1113. PubMed ID: 28771134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the cobas u 701 Analyzer in Urinary Tract Infection Screening.
    Ortiz de la Tabla V; Gázquez G; Infante A; Martin C; Buñuel F; Gutiérrez F
    Ann Lab Med; 2019 Sep; 39(5):464-469. PubMed ID: 31037865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Accuracy of a New Urinalysis System, DongJiu, for Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection.
    Kocer D; Sariguzel FM; Ciraci MZ; Karakukcu C; Oz L
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2015; 45(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 26663800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening of presumptive urinary tract infections by the automated urine sediment analyser sediMAX.
    Tessari A; Osti N; Scarin M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 53 Suppl 2():s1503-8. PubMed ID: 26509783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can routine automated urinalysis reduce culture requests?
    Kayalp D; Dogan K; Ceylan G; Senes M; Yucel D
    Clin Biochem; 2013 Sep; 46(13-14):1285-9. PubMed ID: 23810583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine sediment analyzer FUS200 in culture-positive urinary-tract infections.
    Kocer D; Sarıguzel FM; Karakukcu C
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Aug; 74(5):414-7. PubMed ID: 24693995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for urinary tract infection in infants in the emergency department: which test is best?
    Shaw KN; McGowan KL; Gorelick MH; Schwartz JS
    Pediatrics; 1998 Jun; 101(6):E1. PubMed ID: 9606243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Net benefit of routine urine parameters for urinary tract infection screening: a decision curve analysis.
    Han YQ; Zhang L; Wang JR; Xu SC; Hu ZD
    Ann Transl Med; 2020 May; 8(9):601. PubMed ID: 32566627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytic performance of bacteriuria and leukocyturia obtained by UriSed in culture positive urinary tract infections.
    Karakukcu C; Kayman T; Ozturk A; Torun YA
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(1-2):107-11. PubMed ID: 22372352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Evaluation of the Automated Cobas u 701 Microscopy Analyzer for the Routine Screening of Urine to Identify Negative Samples.
    Waterhouse N; Nichol G; Kasapic D
    Clin Lab; 2019 Jan; 65(1):. PubMed ID: 30775889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments.
    Lee W; Ha JS; Ryoo NH
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep; 30(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 26842372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100).
    Fenili D; Pirovano B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Dec; 36(12):909-17. PubMed ID: 9915222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a urine chemistry analyser and microscopy, culture and sensitivity results to detect the presence of urinary tract infections in an elective orthopaedic population.
    Clement S; Young J; Munday E
    Contemp Nurse; 2004; 17(1-2):89-94. PubMed ID: 17929739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of urinalysis tests and their ability in predicting results of urine cultures: a comparison between automated test strip analyser and flow cytometry in various subpopulations and types of samples.
    Yusuf E; Van Herendael B; van Schaeren J
    J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jul; 70(7):631-636. PubMed ID: 27980053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the automated urine particle analyzer UF-1000i screening for urinary tract infection in nonpregnant women.
    Dai Q; Jiang Y; Shi H; Zhou W; Zhou S; Yang H
    Clin Lab; 2014; 60(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 24660541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of a routine urinalysis in children who require clean intermittent catheterization.
    Forster CS; Haslam DB; Jackson E; Goldstein SL
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):488.e1-488.e5. PubMed ID: 28284733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections.
    Íñigo M; Coello A; Fernández-Rivas G; Carrasco M; Marcó C; Fernández A; Casamajor T; Ausina V
    Clin Chim Acta; 2016 May; 456():31-35. PubMed ID: 26921459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a catalase-based urine test for the detection of urinary tract infection in dogs and cats.
    Kvitko-White HL; Cook AK; Nabity MB; Zhang S; Lawhon SD
    J Vet Intern Med; 2013; 27(6):1379-84. PubMed ID: 24112434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic value of various urine tests in the Jordanian population with urinary tract infection.
    Al-Daghistani HI; Abdel-Dayem M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2002 Oct; 40(10):1048-51. PubMed ID: 12476947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast and accurate prediction of positive and negative urine cultures by flow cytometry.
    Moshaver B; de Boer F; van Egmond-Kreileman H; Kramer E; Stegeman C; Groeneveld P
    BMC Infect Dis; 2016 May; 16():211. PubMed ID: 27189024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.