BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28771992)

  • 1. Improving evaluation at two medical schools.
    Schiekirka-Schwake S; Dreiling K; Pyka K; Anders S; von Steinbüchel N; Raupach T
    Clin Teach; 2018 Aug; 15(4):314-318. PubMed ID: 28771992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facilitators of high-quality teaching in medical school: findings from a nation-wide survey among clinical teachers.
    Schiekirka-Schwake S; Anders S; von Steinbüchel N; Becker JC; Raupach T
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 28962568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formative feedback to students: the mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations.
    Perera J; Lee N; Win K; Perera J; Wijesuriya L
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 18569661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education.
    Al Ansari A; Strachan K; Hashim S; Otoom S
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 17(1):56. PubMed ID: 28302151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of surgical faculty and surgical undergraduate teaching.
    Postuma R
    Can J Surg; 1985 Jul; 28(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 4016610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of motivation, self-efficacy and situational factors on the teaching quality of clinical educators.
    Dybowski C; Sehner S; Harendza S
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 May; 17(1):84. PubMed ID: 28482895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the undergraduate family medicine programme of Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya: quantitative and qualitative student feedback.
    Perera DP; Withana SS; Mendis K; Kasunjith DVT; Jayathilaka WTS; Wickramasuriya S
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 19(1):444. PubMed ID: 31791328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An instrument in Spanish to evaluate the performance of clinical teachers by students].
    Bitran M; Mena B; Riquelme A; Padilla O; Sánchez I; Moreno R
    Rev Med Chil; 2010 Jun; 138(6):685-93. PubMed ID: 20919477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student rating as an effective tool for teacher evaluation.
    Aslam MN
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 23286621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What do faculty feel about teaching in this school? assessment of medical education environment by teachers.
    Shehnaz SI; Arifulla M; Sreedharan J; Gomathi KG
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2017; 30(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 28707640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer group reflection on student ratings stimulates clinical teachers to generate plans to improve their teaching.
    van Lierop M; de Jonge L; Metsemakers J; Dolmans D
    Med Teach; 2018 Mar; 40(3):302-309. PubMed ID: 29183183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of written standardized feedback on the structure and quality of surgical lectures: A prospective cohort study.
    Sterz J; Höfer SH; Bender B; Janko M; Adili F; Ruesseler M
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):292. PubMed ID: 27842580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical student evaluation of faculty in student-preceptor pairs.
    Willett RM; Lawson SR; Gary JS; Kancitis IA
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S30-3. PubMed ID: 17895684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation in undergraduate medical education: Conceptualizing and validating a novel questionnaire for assessing the quality of bedside teaching.
    Dreiling K; Montano D; Poinstingl H; Müller T; Schiekirka-Schwake S; Anders S; von Steinbüchel N; Raupach T
    Med Teach; 2017 Aug; 39(8):820-827. PubMed ID: 28532203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognising excellence in medical education: a student-led award scheme.
    Wheeler NL; Gill SS
    Clin Teach; 2010 Sep; 7(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 21134173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Student perceptions of evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A qualitative study from one medical school.
    Schiekirka S; Reinhardt D; Heim S; Fabry G; Pukrop T; Anders S; Raupach T
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Jun; 12():45. PubMed ID: 22726271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An online discussion between students and teachers: a way forward for meaningful teacher feedback?
    Hunukumbure AD; Horner PJ; Fox J; Thakerar V
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 May; 21(1):289. PubMed ID: 34020631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MedTalks: developing teaching abilities and experience in undergraduate medical students.
    Bandeali S; Chiang A; Ramnanan CJ
    Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1264149. PubMed ID: 28178910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the use of sampling for maximising the efficiency of student-generated faculty teaching evaluations.
    Kreiter CD; Lakshman V
    Med Educ; 2005 Feb; 39(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 15679684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Student views on the effective teaching of physical examination skills: a qualitative study.
    Martens MJ; Duvivier RJ; van Dalen J; Verwijnen GM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 19161490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.