These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28774228)

  • 1. Effects of feedback and test practice on recollection and retrieval monitoring: comparing first graders, third graders, and adults.
    Moore KN; Lampinen JM; Gallo DA; Bridges AJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):424-438. PubMed ID: 28774228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating source memory decisions in the prefrontal cortex: fMRI of diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.
    Gallo DA; McDonough IM; Scimeca J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):955-69. PubMed ID: 19413478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of feedback and recollection rejection instructions on the development of memory monitoring and accuracy.
    Moore KN; Lampinen JM; Nesmith BL; Bridges AJ; Gallo DA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Sep; 221():105434. PubMed ID: 35489136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
    Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Believing does not equal remembering: The effects of social feedback and objective false evidence on belief in occurrence, belief in accuracy, and recollection.
    Otgaar H; Wang J; Fränken JP; Howe ML
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():271-280. PubMed ID: 30359890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of false memory disqualification by true recollection of feedback.
    Joerger TM; Mangels JA
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1695-8. PubMed ID: 18981819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neural correlates of recollection and retrieval monitoring: Relationships with age and recollection performance.
    de Chastelaine M; Mattson JT; Wang TH; Donley BE; Rugg MD
    Neuroimage; 2016 Sep; 138():164-175. PubMed ID: 27155127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developmental changes and the effect of self-generated feedback in metacognitive controlled spacing strategies in 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds, and adults.
    Tsalas N; Paulus M; Sodian B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():140-54. PubMed ID: 25703006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related reduction of the confidence-accuracy relationship in episodic memory: effects of recollection quality and retrieval monitoring.
    Wong JT; Cramer SJ; Gallo DA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1053-65. PubMed ID: 22449027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children's Use of Memory Editing Strategies to Reject Source Misinformation.
    Moore KN; Lampinen JM; Gallo DA; Adams EJ; Bridges AJ
    Child Dev; 2018 Jan; 89(1):219-234. PubMed ID: 28197997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
    Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prefrontal activity and diagnostic monitoring of memory retrieval: FMRI of the criterial recollection task.
    Gallo DA; Kensinger EA; Schacter DL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):135-48. PubMed ID: 16417689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of intentional versus incidental retrieval practices on the role of recollection in test-enhanced learning.
    Pu X; Tse CS
    Cogn Process; 2014 Feb; 15(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 24096993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic.
    Gallo DA; Bell DM; Beier JS; Schacter DL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):730-41. PubMed ID: 16829489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of elaborate feedback during practice tests: Costs and benefits of retrieval prompts.
    van den Broek GSE; Segers E; van Rijn H; Takashima A; Verhoeven L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 30998028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the effects of testing and restudying on recollection in recognition memory.
    Verkoeijen PP; Tabbers HK; Verhage ML
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 21768063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
    Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is all metamemory monitoring spared from aging? A dual-process examination.
    Kuhlmann BG; Undorf M
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Dec; 33(8):1152-1167. PubMed ID: 30550332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrically stimulating prefrontal cortex at retrieval improves recollection accuracy.
    Gray SJ; Brookshire G; Casasanto D; Gallo DA
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():188-94. PubMed ID: 26457823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving metacognitive accuracy: how failing to retrieve practice items reduces overconfidence.
    Miller TM; Geraci L
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():131-40. PubMed ID: 25286123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.