BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28776422)

  • 1. Isotonic designs for phase I trials in partially ordered groups.
    Conaway M
    Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):491-498. PubMed ID: 28776422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A design for phase I trials in completely or partially ordered groups.
    Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 28384843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shift models for dose-finding in partially ordered groups.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30309262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designs for phase I trials in ordered groups.
    Conaway MR; Wages NA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):254-265. PubMed ID: 27624880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase I design for completely or partially ordered treatment schedules.
    Wages NA; O'Quigley J; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(4):569-79. PubMed ID: 24114957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
    Guo B; Li Y
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting isotonic phase I design in the era of model-assisted dose-finding.
    Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Clin Trials; 2018 Oct; 15(5):524-529. PubMed ID: 30101616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isotonic designs for phase I cancer clinical trials with multiple risk groups.
    Yuan Z; Chappell R
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):499-508. PubMed ID: 16279290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A hybrid Bayesian adaptive design for dose response trials.
    Chang M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 16022172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
    Zhang W; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar S
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2365-83. PubMed ID: 16220478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials.
    Conaway MR; Dunbar S; Peddada SD
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):661-9. PubMed ID: 15339288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A robust two-stage design identifying the optimal biological dose for phase I/II clinical trials.
    Zang Y; Lee JJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 27538818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose-finding designs in pediatric phase I clinical trials: comparison by simulations in a realistic timeline framework.
    Doussau A; Asselain B; Le Deley MC; Geoerger B; Doz F; Vassal G; Paoletti X
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):657-65. PubMed ID: 22521954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials.
    Riviere MK; Dubois F; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24464821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid enrollment design for finding the optimal dose in immunotherapy trials with ordered groups.
    Xue X; Foster MC; Ivanova A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 31251112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An adaptive model switching approach for phase I dose-finding trials.
    Daimon T; Zohar S
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 23801550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.
    Yin J; Qin R; Ezzalfani M; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 27633877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive dose finding for phase I clinical trials of drugs used for chemotherapy of cancer.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1805-23. PubMed ID: 12111891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quasi-CRM shift method for partially ordered groups.
    Celum C; Horton BJ; Conaway M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 Jan; 136():107400. PubMed ID: 38000453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An integrated dose-finding tool for phase I trials in oncology.
    Yang S; Wang SJ; Ji Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt B):426-434. PubMed ID: 26419937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.