These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2877645)

  • 1. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
    Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
    Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension.
    Roubsanthisuk W; Wongsurin U; Saravich S; Buranakitjaroen P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 17353647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality assurance in Riva-Rocci blood pressure measurement: simultaneous sphygmomanometry with open and covered pressure display].
    Hartmann B; Weise H; Bassenge E
    Z Kardiol; 1988 Aug; 77(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 3176598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of two indirect methods of blood pressure measurement in ill patients.
    Rebenson-Piano M; Holm K; Foreman MD; Kirchhoff KT
    Nurs Res; 1989; 38(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 2911511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for pseudohypertension. A quantitative, noninvasive approach.
    Hla KM; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1988 Mar; 148(3):673-6. PubMed ID: 3341868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods.
    Burnier M; Gasser UE
    Blood Press; 2008; 17(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [How reliable is conventional blood pressure registration? Comparison with a semi-automatic device].
    Kolb C; Huss R; Mengden T; Vetter W
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1991 Mar; 80(12):286-90. PubMed ID: 2028135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Measurement of arterial pressure using 3 measurement methods in medial arterial calcification].
    Thierry FX; Dueymes JM; Vernier I; Barbe P; Berg P; Dumazer P; Lumbroso C; Conte JJ
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1989 Jul; 82(7):1007-11. PubMed ID: 2510622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overestimation of blood pressure in the elderly.
    Pitlik SD; Morduchowicz G; Blai A; Rosenfeld JB
    Isr J Med Sci; 1986 Jun; 22(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 3759424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observation.
    Graves JW; Bailey KR; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Meverden RA; Grill DE; Sheps SG
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 19(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16733227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
    Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
    Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
    Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.