212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28776479)
1. Parenteral product error detection before and after implementation of intravenous workflow management technology.
Wright KR; Dekarske B; Clark JS; Chaffee BW
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Jan; 25(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28776479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Errors detected in pediatric oral liquid medication doses prepared in an automated workflow management system.
Bledsoe S; Van Buskirk A; Falconer RJ; Hollon A; Hoebing W; Jokic S
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Feb; 75(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29371193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterile product compounding using an i.v. compounding workflow management system at a pediatric hospital.
Moniz TT; Chu S; Tom C; Lutz P; Arnold A; Gura KM; Patterson A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2014 Aug; 71(15):1311-7. PubMed ID: 25027539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of telepharmacy and the use of a gravimetric technology-assisted workflow system for remote sterile product pharmacist checks.
Jean SJ; Francart SJ; Eckel SF; Schenkat D; Eberwein S; Lamm M; Barnes N; Valgus JM; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2020 Mar; 77(7):560-567. PubMed ID: 32086506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. E-prescribing errors identified in a compounding pharmacy: a quality-improvement project.
Reed-Kane D; Kittell K; Adkins J; Flocks S; Nguyen T
Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 24881345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for i.v. compounding errors when using an automated workflow management system.
Deng Y; Lin AC; Hingl J; Huang G; Altaye M; Maynard H; Mayhaus D; Penm J
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Jun; 73(12):887-93. PubMed ID: 27261239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. E-prescription errors and their resolution in a community compounding pharmacy.
Reed-Kane D; Vasquez K; Pavlik A; Peragine J; Sandberg M
Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(2):159-61. PubMed ID: 24881120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation.
Bucci TG; Hedrick TL; Roberts PA; Lin K; South MD; Willoughby IR; Eckel SF; Hess ET; Eberwein S; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jul; 76(14):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 31361879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety.
Eckel SF; Higgins JP; Hess E; Cerbone T; Civiello JB; Conley C; Jafari N; Shah S; Speth SL; Thornton L
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(12):895-901. PubMed ID: 31361850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrating technology to improve medication administration.
Prusch AE; Suess TM; Paoletti RD; Olin ST; Watts SD
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2011 May; 68(9):835-42. PubMed ID: 21515868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation and evaluation of a gravimetric i.v. workflow software system in an oncology ambulatory care pharmacy.
Reece KM; Lozano MA; Roux R; Spivey SM
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Feb; 73(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 26796911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of using an intravenous workflow management system (IVWMS) on cost and patient safety.
Lin AC; Deng Y; Thaibah H; Hingl J; Penm J; Ivey MF; Thomas M
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Jul; 115():73-79. PubMed ID: 29779722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of electronic health record implementation on pharmacist interventions related to oral chemotherapy management.
Finn A; Bondarenka C; Edwards K; Hartwell R; Letton C; Perez A
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2017 Dec; 23(8):563-574. PubMed ID: 27573921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of barcode technology on medication preparation safety: a quasi-experimental study.
Küng K; Aeschbacher K; Rütsche A; Goette J; Zürcher S; Schmidli J; Schwendimann R
Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Mar; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 33783482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Innovations in Medication Preparation Safety and Wastage Reduction: Use of a Workflow Management System in a Pediatric Hospital.
Davis SJ; Hurtado J; Nguyen R; Huynh T; Lindon I; Hudnall C; Bork S
Hosp Pharm; 2017 Jan; 52(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28179741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of an i.v.-compounding robot in a hospital-based cancer center pharmacy.
Yaniv AW; Knoer SJ
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Nov; 70(22):2030-7. PubMed ID: 24173011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compounding & dispensing errors before and after implementing barcode technology in a nuclear pharmacy.
Galbraith W; Shadid J
Int J Pharm Compd; 2012; 16(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 23050303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of real-time data obtained from gravimetric preparation of antineoplastic agents shows medication errors with possible critical therapeutic impact: Results of a large-scale, multicentre, multinational, retrospective study.
Terkola R; Czejka M; Bérubé J
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2017 Aug; 42(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 28429389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety in small community hospitals.
Higgins JP; Hardt S; Cowan D; Beasley E; Eckel SF
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(13):964-969. PubMed ID: 31361882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic evidence review of rates and burden of harm of intravenous admixture drug preparation errors in healthcare settings.
Hedlund N; Beer I; Hoppe-Tichy T; Trbovich P
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e015912. PubMed ID: 29288174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
