These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 287769)

  • 1. Change in the gonial angle.
    Fish SF
    J Oral Rehabil; 1979 Jul; 6(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 287769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers--a panoramic radiograph study.
    Raustia AM; Salonen MA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jul; 24(7):512-6. PubMed ID: 9250838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-year changes in the edentulous mandible as determined on oblique cephalometric radiographs.
    Winter CM; Woelfel JB; Igarashi T
    J Dent Res; 1974; 53(6):1455-67. PubMed ID: 4610022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between occlusal plane determinants and craniofacial structures.
    Nissan J; Barnea E; Zeltzer C; Cardash HS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):587-91. PubMed ID: 12787455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism.
    Xie QF; Ainamo A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15153856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The determination of free-way space in edentulous patients: a cephalometric approach.
    Potgieter PJ; Monteith BD; Kemp PL
    J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Jul; 10(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 6577155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height.
    Huumonen S; Sipilä K; Haikola B; Tapio M; Söderholm AL; Remes-Lyly T; Oikarinen K; Raustia AM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 19912483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A roentgenographic cephalometric study on vertical dimension (comparison between the dentulous and the edentulous with complete dentures) (author's transl)].
    Uchida T
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1978 Dec; 45(4):669-81. PubMed ID: 285195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular morphological changes in low bone mass edentulous females: evaluation of panoramic radiographs.
    Dutra V; Devlin H; Susin C; Yang J; Horner K; Fernandes AR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):663-8. PubMed ID: 17052644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiological evaluation of changes in the gonial angle after teeth extraction and wearing of dentures: a 3-year longitudinal study.
    Yanikoğlu N; Yilmaz B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):e55-60. PubMed ID: 18417386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring mandibular vertical bone resorption by radiographic cephalometry.
    Vierheller PG; Speiser WH; al-Rahmani AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Jul; 26(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 5281470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postural face height in full denture wearers. A longitudinal x-ray cephalometric study.
    Carlsson GE; Ericson S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1967 Aug; 25(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 5233922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. A longitudinal, clinical, and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years.
    Carlsson GE; Persson G
    Odontol Revy; 1967; 18(1):27-54. PubMed ID: 5227389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in the gonial region induced by alterations of muscle length.
    Hendricksen RP; McNamara JA; Carlson DS; Yellich GM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1982 Sep; 40(9):570-7. PubMed ID: 6955472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical dimension measurements.
    Sheppard IM; Sheppard SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Sep; 34(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 22334988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The superior genial tubercles in totally edentulous patients].
    Ott PA
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1973 Feb; 83(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 4510298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cephalometric study comparing the occlusal plane in dentulous and edentulous subjects in relation to the maxillomandibular space.
    D'Souza NL; Bhargava K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Feb; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8667277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Determination of the individual-optimal occlusion height in the edentulous mouth].
    Szabó M
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1975 Jan; 30(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 1055680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram.
    Mattila K; Altonen M; Haavikko K
    Angle Orthod; 1977 Apr; 47(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 266380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spongy bone architecture of edentulous mandibles: a television radiographic evaluation.
    De Aguiar AE; Klein AI; Beck JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1968 Jan; 19(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 5234943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.