These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28777230)

  • 41. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.
    Souza PE; Tremblay KL
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Sep; 10(3):119-43. PubMed ID: 16959734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vocabulary Facilitates Speech Perception in Children With Hearing Aids.
    Klein KE; Walker EA; Kirby B; McCreery RW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2281-2296. PubMed ID: 28738138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identification and Comprehension of Narrow Focus by Arabic-Speaking Adolescents With Moderate-to-Profound Hearing Loss.
    Kawar K; Kishon-Rabin L; Segal O
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 May; 65(5):2029-2046. PubMed ID: 35472256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Late auditory evoked potentials in elderly long-term hearing-aid users with unilateral or bilateral fittings.
    Bertoli S; Probst R; Bodmer D
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):58-69. PubMed ID: 21569828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluating the Performance of a Visually Guided Hearing Aid Using a Dynamic Auditory-Visual Word Congruence Task.
    Roverud E; Best V; Mason CR; Streeter T; Kidd G
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):756-769. PubMed ID: 29252977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Acclimatization: speech recognition in hearing aid users].
    Prates LP; Iório MC
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 17180794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Acoustically evoked auditory change complex in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a potential objective tool for identifying cochlear implant candidates.
    He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Woodard J; Park LR; Hatch DR; Roush P; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 25422994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.