273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28777649)
1. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
Brown AL; Phillips J; Slanetz PJ; Fein-Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942. PubMed ID: 28777649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility and Outcomes of Imaging Evaluation for Palpable Lumps in the Postmastectomy Patient.
Dashevsky BZ; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Joe BN; Lee AY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 31039027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of Diagnostic Mammography as the Primary Imaging Modality for Palpable Lumps in Women With Almost Entirely Fatty Breasts.
Linden OE; Hayward JH; Price ER; Kelil T; Joe BN; Lee AY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):938-944. PubMed ID: 32023120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New Palpable Breast Lump With Recent Negative Mammogram: Is Repeat Mammography Necessary?
Leung SE; Ben-Nachum I; Kornecki A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):200-4. PubMed ID: 27081707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump.
Dennis MA; Parker SH; Klaus AJ; Stavros AT; Kaske TI; Clark SB
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 11274555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with palpable breast abnormalities and negative mammographic and sonographic findings.
Yalniz C; Campbell D; Le-Petross C; Shin K; Bevers TB; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1289-1295. PubMed ID: 32108973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in women presenting with palpable breast findings.
Sorin V; Faermann R; Yagil Y; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Halshtok-Neiman O; Ben-David MA; Sklair-Levy M
Clin Imaging; 2020 May; 61():99-105. PubMed ID: 32014818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump.
Pande AR; Lohani B; Sayami P; Pradhan S
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2003; 1(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 16388202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.
Skaane P
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1999; 420():1-47. PubMed ID: 10693544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of Mammography for Women 30-39 Years Old Presenting With Breast Symptoms.
Chen Y; Chou SS; Blaschke EM; Specht MC; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1416-1424. PubMed ID: 30300000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The dangers of mammography in diagnosing a palpable lump in the breast].
Scharf GM; Mentis H; Nel PJ; Mieny CJ
S Afr Med J; 1986 May; 69(11):676-7. PubMed ID: 3704855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age.
Chung M; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Knobel A; Greenwood HI; Ray KM; Joe BN; Lee AY
Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):316-324. PubMed ID: 32870133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography of women with suspicious breast lumps.
Young JO; Sadowsky NL; Young JW; Herman L
Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):807-9. PubMed ID: 3718215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ability of mammography to reveal nonpalpable breast cancer in women with palpable breast masses.
Rosen EL; Sickles E; Keating D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 9930773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.
Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and value of breast ultrasound for primary imaging evaluation of symptomatic women 30-39 years of age.
Lehman CD; Lee CI; Loving VA; Portillo MS; Peacock S; DeMartini WB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1169-77. PubMed ID: 23096195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normal mammography and ultrasonography in the setting of palpable breast cancer.
Beyer T; Moonka R
Am J Surg; 2003 May; 185(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 12727559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast.
Brown J; Smith RC; Lee CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 May; 176(5):1249-54. PubMed ID: 11312189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
