These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 287784)

  • 1. An evaluation of the root topography following periodontal instrumentation--a scanning electron microscopic study.
    D'Silva IV; Nayak RP; Cherian KM; Mulky MJ
    J Periodontol; 1979 Jun; 50(6):283-90. PubMed ID: 287784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A scanning electron micrographical study of root surfaces and subgingival bacteria after hand and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Garnick JJ; Dent J
    J Periodontol; 1989 Aug; 60(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 2689628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Tartar removal by hand instruments and by ultrasonic apparatus. Current approaches and recent findings].
    Picarelli A; Alessio R; Fossato L
    Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 6394984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Root planing: a perspective.
    Garrett JS
    J Periodontol; 1977 Sep; 48(9):553-7. PubMed ID: 333088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.
    Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Leal PC; Gimenes-Sakima PP; Marcantonio E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total calculus removal: an attainable objective?
    Kepic TJ; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1990 Jan; 61(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 2179511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo.
    Schwarz F; Bieling K; Venghaus S; Sculean A; Jepsen S; Becker J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 16489946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hand instrumentation versus ultrasonics in the removal of endotoxins from root surfaces.
    Nishimine D; O'Leary TJ
    J Periodontol; 1979 Jul; 50(7):345-9. PubMed ID: 381632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro.
    Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning electron microscope: an SEM study of periodontally instrumented root surfaces, comparing sharp, dull, and damaged curettes and ultrasonic instruments.
    Benfenati MP; Montesani MT; Roncati M; Nathanson D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1987; 7(2):50-67. PubMed ID: 3294697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical improvement of gingival conditions following ultrasonic versus hand instrumentation of periodontal pockets.
    Torfason T; Kiger R; Selvig KA; Egelberg J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1979 Jun; 6(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic evaluation of three methods of periodontal root surface treatment in humans.
    Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 15857084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of the Vector -system compared with conventional subgingival debridement in vitro and in vivo.
    Braun A; Krause F; Hartschen V; Falk W; Jepsen S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Aug; 33(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 16899100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Scanning electron microscopy study on periodontally diseased root surfaces].
    Higashi T; Iida K; Okamoto H
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1983 Jun; 15(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 6579124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.
    Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root substance removal with Er:YAG laser radiation at different parameters using a new delivery system.
    Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Haffner C; Benz C; Hickel R
    J Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 71(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 10711604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.