329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28778695)
1. Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Compared with open approach.
Zhang Z; Xu M; Guo M; Liu X
Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():98-104. PubMed ID: 28778695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Qi W; Zixiang W; Tianwei Z; Shuai F; Sai Z; Gang S; Ming W
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 117(5):957-969. PubMed ID: 29878389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Lin D; Ye T; Ma L; Shao L; Song Z; Jiang S; Xiang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):990-994. PubMed ID: 27680065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy.
Ma J; Zhan C; Wang L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wang Q
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1728-33. PubMed ID: 24650587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer].
Xie M; Liu C; Sun X; Guo M; Wu H; Xu M
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 53(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 26359073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience of total thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Merritt RE
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Apr; 22(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 22393924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer.
Mei X; Xu M; Guo M; Xie M; Liu C; Wang Z
ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study.
Wang J; Wei N; Jiang N; Lu Y; Zhang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(6):e14416. PubMed ID: 30732195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of gastric tube in construction technique thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy].
Rong B; Guo M; Wu X
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):876-879. PubMed ID: 28836245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
