BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28779266)

  • 1. In silico study of bone tissue regeneration in an idealised porous hydrogel scaffold using a mechano-regulation algorithm.
    Zhao F; Mc Garrigle MJ; Vaughan TJ; McNamara LM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Feb; 17(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 28779266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A coupled diffusion-fluid pressure model to predict cell density distribution for cells encapsulated in a porous hydrogel scaffold under mechanical loading.
    Zhao F; Vaughan TJ; Mc Garrigle MJ; McNamara LM
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Oct; 89():181-189. PubMed ID: 28822899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures.
    Zhao F; Vaughan TJ; McNamara LM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Jun; 15(3):561-77. PubMed ID: 26224148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation of dexamethasone-loaded biphasic calcium phosphate nanoparticles/collagen porous composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
    Chen Y; Kawazoe N; Chen G
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Feb; 67():341-353. PubMed ID: 29242161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial mechanical conditions within an optimized bone scaffold do not ensure bone regeneration - an in silico analysis.
    Perier-Metz C; Duda GN; Checa S
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Oct; 20(5):1723-1731. PubMed ID: 34097188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo.
    Kim JA; Lim J; Naren R; Yun HS; Park EK
    Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 44():155-67. PubMed ID: 27554019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geometry Design Optimization of Functionally Graded Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Mechanobiological Approach.
    Boccaccio A; Uva AE; Fiorentino M; Mori G; Monno G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146935. PubMed ID: 26771746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiscale fluid-structure interaction modelling to determine the mechanical stimulation of bone cells in a tissue engineered scaffold.
    Zhao F; Vaughan TJ; Mcnamara LM
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Apr; 14(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 24903125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow velocity-driven differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in silk fibroin scaffolds: A combined experimental and computational approach.
    Vetsch JR; Betts DC; Müller R; Hofmann S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180781. PubMed ID: 28686698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Porous Scaffolds for Regeneration of Cartilage, Bone and Osteochondral Tissue.
    Chen G; Kawazoe N
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1058():171-191. PubMed ID: 29691822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct deposited porous scaffolds of calcium phosphate cement with alginate for drug delivery and bone tissue engineering.
    Lee GS; Park JH; Shin US; Kim HW
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Aug; 7(8):3178-86. PubMed ID: 21539944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between micro-porosity, water permeability and mechanical behavior in scaffolds for cartilage engineering.
    Vikingsson L; Claessens B; Gómez-Tejedor JA; Gallego Ferrer G; Gómez Ribelles JL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Aug; 48():60-69. PubMed ID: 25913609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gelatin methacrylate scaffold for bone tissue engineering: The influence of polymer concentration.
    Celikkin N; Mastrogiacomo S; Jaroszewicz J; Walboomers XF; Swieszkowski W
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Jan; 106(1):201-209. PubMed ID: 28884519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design, fabrication and in vitro evaluation of a novel polymer-hydrogel hybrid scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
    Igwe JC; Mikael PE; Nukavarapu SP
    J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2014 Feb; 8(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 22689304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional piezoelectric fibrous scaffolds selectively promote mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.
    Damaraju SM; Shen Y; Elele E; Khusid B; Eshghinejad A; Li J; Jaffe M; Arinzeh TL
    Biomaterials; 2017 Dec; 149():51-62. PubMed ID: 28992510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone regeneration from human mesenchymal stem cells on porous hydroxyapatite-PLGA-collagen bioactive polymer scaffolds.
    Bhuiyan DB; Middleton JC; Tannenbaum R; Wick TM
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2017; 28(6):671-685. PubMed ID: 29171970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparation, characterization and in vitro analysis of novel structured nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
    Wang J; Yu X
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Aug; 6(8):3004-12. PubMed ID: 20144749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flow rates in perfusion bioreactors to maximise mineralisation in bone tissue engineering in vitro.
    Zhao F; van Rietbergen B; Ito K; Hofmann S
    J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 79():232-237. PubMed ID: 30149981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparation and characterization of a three-dimensional printed scaffold based on a functionalized polyester for bone tissue engineering applications.
    Seyednejad H; Gawlitta D; Dhert WJ; van Nostrum CF; Vermonden T; Hennink WE
    Acta Biomater; 2011 May; 7(5):1999-2006. PubMed ID: 21241834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decellularized Bone Matrix Scaffold for Bone Regeneration.
    Chen G; Lv Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1577():239-254. PubMed ID: 28770492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.