These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28780215)

  • 21. Emergency Contraception.
    Batur P; Kransdorf LN; Casey PM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2016 Jun; 91(6):802-7. PubMed ID: 27261868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Educational Intervention Among Adolescents and Young Adults on Emergency Contraception Options.
    Harper CC; Jones E; Brindis CD; Watson A; Schroeder R; Boyer CB; Edelman A; Trieu S; Yarger J
    J Adolesc Health; 2023 Jun; 72(6):993-996. PubMed ID: 36894464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Access to the copper IUD as post-coital contraception: results from a mystery caller study.
    Schubert FD; Bishop ES; Gold M
    Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):561-566. PubMed ID: 27374737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acceptability of intrauterine contraception among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a randomised clinical trial.
    Kakaire O; Tumwesigye NM; Byamugisha JK; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Jun; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 26895345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a follow-up study.
    Baird AS; Trussell J; Webb A
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2015 Apr; 41(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 24869461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A survey of women obtaining emergency contraception: are they interested in using the copper IUD?
    Turok DK; Gurtcheff SE; Handley E; Simonsen SE; Sok C; North R; Frost C; Murphy PA
    Contraception; 2011 May; 83(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 21477687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acceptability of randomization to levonorgestrel versus copper intrauterine device among women requesting IUD insertion for contraception.
    Achilles SL; Chen BA; Lee JK; Gariepy AM; Creinin MD
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 26297203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The safety of available and emerging options for emergency contraception.
    Lee JK; Schwarz EB
    Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2017 Oct; 16(10):1163-1171. PubMed ID: 28730840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emergency contraception.
    Dunn S; Guilbert E; Lefebvre G; Allaire C; Arneja J; Birch C; Fortier M; Jeffrey J; Vilos G; Wagner MS; Grant L; Beaudoin F; Cherniak D; Pellizzari R; Sadownik L; Saraf-Dhar R; Turnbull V;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 Aug; 25(8):673-9, 680-7; quiz 688-90. PubMed ID: 12908020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A pilot study of the Copper T380A IUD and oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception.
    Turok DK; Gurtcheff SE; Handley E; Simonsen SE; Sok C; Murphy P
    Contraception; 2010 Dec; 82(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 21074014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.
    Smith LF; Whitfield MJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Aug; 45(397):409-14. PubMed ID: 7576845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Access to emergency contraception in Kansas City clinics.
    French VA; Rangel AV; Mattingly TL
    Contraception; 2018 Dec; 98(6):482-485. PubMed ID: 30369407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Update on emergency contraception.
    Fok WK; Blumenthal PD
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 28(6):522-529. PubMed ID: 27676405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contraception use and attitudes: women's concerns regarding hormonal contraception and copper intrauterine devices.
    Svahn S; Niemeyer Hultstrand J; Tydén T; Ekstrand Ragnar M
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Dec; 26(6):473-478. PubMed ID: 34590968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emergency contraception -- mechanisms of action.
    Gemzell-Danielsson K; Berger C; P G L L
    Contraception; 2013 Mar; 87(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 23114735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An emergency contraception algorithm based on risk assessment: changes in clinicians' practice and patients' choices.
    McKay RJ; Gilbert L
    J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2013 Jul; 39(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 23430815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choice of Emergency Contraceptive and Decision Making Regarding Subsequent Unintended Pregnancy.
    Royer PA; Turok DK; Sanders JN; Saltzman HM
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Oct; 25(10):1038-1043. PubMed ID: 27032057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Emergency contraception: a survey of 1773 women.
    Bastianelli C; Rosato E; Farris M; Benagiano G
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Dec; 21(6):455-461. PubMed ID: 27684583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?
    Goodman SR; El Ayadi AM; Rocca CH; Kohn JE; Benedict CE; Dieseldorff JR; Harper CC
    Contraception; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29679591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.