337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28780384)
1. Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant-abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck.
Liu Y; Wang J
Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Nov; 83():153-160. PubMed ID: 28780384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Caricasulo R; Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Fantozzi G; Cucchi A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):653-664. PubMed ID: 29761902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months.
Chou CT; Morris HF; Ochi S; Walker L; DesRosiers D
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15255390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Leite CM; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 21909485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microgap and Micromotion at the Implant Abutment Interface Cause Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implant but More Evidence is Needed.
Alqutaibi AY; Aboalrejal AN
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 18(2):171-172. PubMed ID: 29747801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL; Bosshardt DD; Grize L; Higginbottom FL; Jones AA; Jung RE; Wieland M; Dard M
J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-Abutment Connections: A Review of Biologic Consequences and Peri-implantitis Implications.
Sasada Y; Cochran DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1296-1307. PubMed ID: 29140374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around internal-hex implants with switched platform: a clinical case report series.
de Almeida FD; Carvalho AC; Fontes M; Pedrosa A; Costa R; Noleto JW; Mourão CF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 21691606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface.
Broggini N; McManus LM; Hermann JS; Medina RU; Oates TW; Schenk RK; Buser D; Mellonig JT; Cochran DL
J Dent Res; 2003 Mar; 82(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 12598555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of implant-abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review.
Schwarz F; Hegewald A; Becker J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 23782338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth?
Romanos GE; Javed F
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 24860981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micromovement Evaluation of Original and Compatible Abutments at the Implant-abutment Interface.
Berberi A; Maroun D; Kanj W; Amine EZ; Philippe A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):907-913. PubMed ID: 27965499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bosco AF; de Melo LG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 22010074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 20556253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
