224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28781290)
1. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
Ranavolo A; Varrecchia T; Rinaldi M; Silvetti A; Serrao M; Conforto S; Draicchio F
Ind Health; 2017 Oct; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristics.
Barim MS; Sesek RF; Capanoglu MF; Drinkaus P; Schall MC; Gallagher S; Davis GA
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():67-73. PubMed ID: 30487111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
Lu ML; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Davis KG
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
Dehghan P; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
Waters T; Occhipinti E; Colombini D; Alvarez-Casado E; Fox R
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
Garg A; Kapellusch JM
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modification of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation to Determine the Individual Manual Lifting Risk in Malaysia's Manufacturing Industry.
Dawad NA; Yasin SM; Darus A; Jamil AT; Nyi Naing N
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57747. PubMed ID: 38715993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
Behjati M; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding outcome metrics of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
Fox RR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E; Jaeger M
Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102897. PubMed ID: 31422239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion.
Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110024. PubMed ID: 32961423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low back pain due to manual lifting: expanded cross-sectional analysis.
Waters TR; Lu ML; Piacitelli LA; Werren D; Deddens JA
J Occup Environ Med; 2011 Sep; 53(9):1061-7. PubMed ID: 21866048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Mar; 29(1):358-365. PubMed ID: 35253606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting.
Singh D; Park W; Hwang D; Levy MS
Work; 2015 Jun; 51(2):337-48. PubMed ID: 25248524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
Waters TR; Baron SL; Piacitelli LA; Anderson VP; Skov T; Haring-Sweeney M; Wall DK; Fine LJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):386-94; discussion 395. PubMed ID: 10065524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting the load constant of the revised NIOSH lifting equation based on demographics.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 35758150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The NIOSH lifting equation and low-back pain, Part 2: Association with seeking care in the backworks prospective cohort study.
Garg A; Kapellusch JM; Hegmann KT; Moore JS; Boda S; Bhoyar P; Thiese MS; Merryweather A; Deckow-Schaefer G; Bloswick D; Malloy EJ
Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 24669542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
