These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28782317)

  • 1. Statistical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests (Part 1): Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values.
    Gogtay NJ; Thatte UM
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2017 Jun; 65(6):80-84. PubMed ID: 28782317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of operational characteristics for binary tests with clustered data.
    Kwak M; Um SW; Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2325-33. PubMed ID: 25801180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic tests (2) - positive and negative predictive values.
    Smith CJ
    Phlebology; 2012 Sep; 27(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 23155153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Fardy JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy assessment.
    Mandrekar JN
    J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Jun; 5(6):763-4. PubMed ID: 20502268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The measurement parameters and its significance of diagnostic tests].
    Zhang ZY; Zheng JW; Yang C; Zhang SY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15269847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs.
    Moskowitz CS; Pepe MS
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 16895044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference values: no need for confusion.
    Obuchowski NA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jun; 137(6):1572-3. PubMed ID: 19464491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Stojanović M; Andjelković Apostolović M; Stojanović D; Milosević Z; Ignjatović A; Lakusić VM; Golubović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Nov; 71(11):1062-5. PubMed ID: 25536811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of a routine urinalysis in children who require clean intermittent catheterization.
    Forster CS; Haslam DB; Jackson E; Goldstein SL
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):488.e1-488.e5. PubMed ID: 28284733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding Negative Predictive Value of Diagnostic Tests Used in Clinical Practice.
    Umberger RA; Hatfield LA; Speck PM
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2017; 36(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27902658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
    Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
    J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding statistical terms: 4 - Diagnostic tests.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Jun; 47(6):71-2. PubMed ID: 19494344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Weinstein S; Obuchowski NA; Lieber ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 15615943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
    Fardy JM; Barrett BJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():289-300. PubMed ID: 25694317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to analyze reports on new clinical tests.
    Davidson RA
    Contemp Urol; 1995 Jul; 7(7):41-7. PubMed ID: 10150578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graphic representation of numerically calculated predictive values: an easily comprehended method of evaluating diagnostic tests.
    Daniel BL; Daniel TM
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 8246708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Mar; 96(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 17407452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.