These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of operational characteristics for binary tests with clustered data. Kwak M; Um SW; Jung SH Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2325-33. PubMed ID: 25801180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic tests (2) - positive and negative predictive values. Smith CJ Phlebology; 2012 Sep; 27(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 23155153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of diagnostic tests. Fardy JM Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The measurement parameters and its significance of diagnostic tests]. Zhang ZY; Zheng JW; Yang C; Zhang SY Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15269847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs. Moskowitz CS; Pepe MS Clin Trials; 2006; 3(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 16895044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference values: no need for confusion. Obuchowski NA J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jun; 137(6):1572-3. PubMed ID: 19464491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Stojanović M; Andjelković Apostolović M; Stojanović D; Milosević Z; Ignjatović A; Lakusić VM; Golubović M Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Nov; 71(11):1062-5. PubMed ID: 25536811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. Carneiro AV Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of a routine urinalysis in children who require clean intermittent catheterization. Forster CS; Haslam DB; Jackson E; Goldstein SL J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):488.e1-488.e5. PubMed ID: 28284733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding Negative Predictive Value of Diagnostic Tests Used in Clinical Practice. Umberger RA; Hatfield LA; Speck PM Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2017; 36(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27902658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices]. Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test. Veziris N; Jarlier V Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How to analyze reports on new clinical tests. Davidson RA Contemp Urol; 1995 Jul; 7(7):41-7. PubMed ID: 10150578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Graphic representation of numerically calculated predictive values: an easily comprehended method of evaluating diagnostic tests. Daniel BL; Daniel TM Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 8246708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]