126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28782825)
1. Peer Review Certifies Quality and Innovation in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.
Waldman SA; Terzic A
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Sep; 102(3):373-377. PubMed ID: 28782825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics: Past, Present, and Future.
Waldman SA; Terzic A
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Mar; 101(3):300-303. PubMed ID: 28194770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
Popp RL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics: the next five years.
Waldman SA; Terzic A
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2015 Jan; 97(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 25670374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medwaves editorial history, policies and guidelines: 2. Editorial policies.
Bachelet VC
Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6909. PubMed ID: 28430770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Program descriptions: information for authors and peer reviewers.
Huston P; Elmslie T
CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 8873635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medwaves editorial history, policies and guidelines: 3. Section policies.
Bachelet VC
Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6910. PubMed ID: 28430764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review and refereeing in science.
Lore W
East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
Pravinkumar E
Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Guidelines for writing manuscripts about community-based participatory research for peer-reviewed journals.
Bordeaux BC; Wiley C; Tandon SD; Horowitz CR; Brown PB; Bass EB
Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2007; 1(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 20208291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited.
Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Apr; 40(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 20486989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards of practice and uniformity in references style.
Salvagno GL; Lippi G; Montagnana M; Guidi GC
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(4):437-8. PubMed ID: 18605930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review should continue after publication.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals.
Eldredge J
Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. We are delighted to have received 273 replies from reviewers specifying their subspecialty interests. Introduction.
Frank JD; Mouriquand P; Caldamone A; Malone PS
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):223. PubMed ID: 22583554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
