1695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28783570)
1. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Diagonal-Steering-Based Binaural Beamforming Algorithm Incorporating a Diagonal Speech Localizer for Persons With Bilateral Hearing Impairment.
Lee JC; Nam KW; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25959133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.
Best V; Mejia J; Freeston K; van Hoesel RJ; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):727-35. PubMed ID: 26140298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.
Fan Y; Gifford RH
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109020. PubMed ID: 38763034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
